NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More:

NFRA mandates timely maintenance, archival, and submission of audit files, warning auditors against alterations or delays.
NFRA Tightens Rules on Audit File Maintenance and Submission

NFRA Cracks Down on Audit File Lapses: 60-Day Completion Rule, 7-Day Submission Deadline, Many More
The National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) has issued a circular dated December 16, 2025, addressed to all the Statutory Auditors of Public Interest Entities (PIEs) covered under Rule 3 of NFRA Rules, 2018, reminding them of their strict responsibilities towards maintenance, storage, archival, and timely submission of the audit file to NFRA.
During several legal processes, audit companies are asked by the NFRA to furnish audit files as proof of the work done by them in respect of specific audit engagements. NFRA observed several mistakes made by audit companies while furnishing their audit files. Many audit firms delay submitting audit files, seek repeated extensions, or convert files between physical and electronic formats in ways that damage the integrity of audit evidence. Such practices are against the Standards on Auditing (SA) and Standard on Quality Control (SQC 1).
Therefore, vide the present circular, NFRA has issued instructions for all the audit companies to properly complete their audit files and archive them within 60 days from the date of the audit report and generally retain them for at least 7 years. However, if any regulatory, court, or investigative proceedings are ongoing, audit files must be preserved even beyond 7 years.
The circular strongly warns against:
- Creating or modifying audit documents after the permitted time
- Converting electronic records into scanned, non-searchable PDFs
- Losing metadata, formulas, links, or audit trails due to improper format changes
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2622My Recent Articles
- Mere Expense Disallowance Cannot Trigger Section 271(1)(c) Penalty; ITAT Partly Allows AppealPremium
- ROC: Company and Directors Faces Penalty for Not Having Any Office at Registered Location of BusinessPremium
- ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Failure to Furnish Financial Statements for FY 2021-22
- ICSI Seeks Further Extension of CCFS 2026 Beyond August 31 Amid Technical Issues on MCA-21 Portal
- ICSI Submits Follow-Up Representation to MCA, Seeks Resolution of 17 Key Issues to Improve MCA-21 Compliance
Up Next
Loading suggestions…







