CESTAT allows refund of CVD and SAD under Section 142(3) and (6) of the CGST Act

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT Delhi) in the matter of M/s New Age Laminators Pvt. Limited Vs. Commissioner(Central Excise & GST) ruled out that CESTAT allows refund of CVD and SAD under Section 142(3) and (6) of the CGST Act.

The Petitioner is the holder of Central Excise registration No. AABCN3778JEM002 are engaged in manufacture of Automotive Metalised Polyester Laminated Craft Paper falling under sub heading 4811 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant imported inputs i.e. Sack Kraft Paper and LDPE without payment of Customs duty, before roll out of GST, against Advance Licence. As per foreign trade policy, when the export obligations are not fulfilled against a particular authorisation, the assessee is required to pay forgone customs duty alongwith interest. It appeared that the appellant had failed to fulfil their export obligations within the prescribed time limit, therefore they are liable to pay Customs duties i.e. Basic Customs Duty, Countervailing Duty (CVD), Special Additional Duty (SAD) & Cess. The appellant paid Rs. 5,77,839/- vide challan No. 34 dated 15.05.2019 and Rs.2,07,148/- vide challan No. 60477 dated 22.05.2018. As the appellant had deposited the duties after implementation of GST, therefore they are not eligible to claim cenvat credit of CVD and SAD, as there is no provision in GST to avail input credit of the duties paid for regularization of bonafide default under Advance authorisation (relating to erstwhile regime of Central Excise), hence the appellant filed refund claims.

The Coram found out that, “Having considered the rival contentions, I find that the payment of CVD and SAD subsequently during GST regime, for the imports made prior to 30.06.2017 is not disputed under the advance authorisation scheme. It is also not disputed that the appellant have paid the CVD and SAD in May, 2018 & May, 2019, by way of regularisation on being so pointed out by the Revenue Authority. Further, I find that the Court below have erred in observing in the impugned order, that without producing proper records of duty paid invoices etc. in manufacture of dutiable final product, refund cannot be given. I further find that refund of CVD and SAD in question is allowable, as credit is no longer available under the GST regime, which was however available under the erstwhile regime of Central Excise prior to 30.06.2017. Accordingly, I hold that the appellant is entitled to refund under the provisions of Section 142(3) and (6) of the CGST Act.”

The Appellate Tribunal ruled out that, “Accordingly, I direct the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner to grant refunds to the appellants of the amount of SAD & CVD as reflected in the show causes notices and also in the orders-in-appeal. Such refund shall be granted within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of this order alongwith interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. The impugned orders are set aside.”

The Judgment was made by Hon’ble Mr. Anil Choudhary.

The Petitioner was represented by Sh. G. G. Gupta, Advocate and Respondent represented by Shri Ravi Kapur.

To Read Judgment Download PDF Given Below: