Company Faced Rs. 23.98 Crore Section 68 Addition Over Preference Share Capital; ITAT Deletes Addition After Revenue Failed to Prove Round-Tripping

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has granted relief to Chat Computers Ltd. by deleting a long-pending addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2005-06. The Tribunal held that once the company had furnished basic documentary evidence establishing the identity of the investors, the burden shifted to the tax department to prove that the funds actually belonged to the assessee, which it failed to do.

The dispute arose during scrutiny proceedings when the Assessing Officer questioned substantial amounts received by the company as share application money and share capital. Suspecting that the transactions were accommodation entries designed to introduce unaccounted funds into the company, the AO treated the receipts as unexplained cash credits under Section 68 and added the amount to the company’s taxable income.

Throughout the proceedings, the company maintained that the investments were genuine and supported its claim by furnishing details of the investor entities, including their names, addresses, PAN details and corporate records. However, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld the addition, holding that the assessee had failed to satisfactorily establish the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the transactions.

When the matter reached the ITAT, the Bench comprising Shri Arun Khodpia (Accountant Member) and Shri Pawan Singh (Judicial Member) noted that similar issues involving the same group of investors had already been examined in connected matters by coordinate benches. Following those decisions, the Tribunal observed that the assessee had placed sufficient primary evidence on record to establish the identity of the share applicants.

The Tribunal further held that after the assessee discharges its initial burden by producing relevant investor details and supporting documents, the onus shifts to the Revenue to bring material showing that the transactions were merely a façade for routing the assessee’s own undisclosed money. In the present case, no evidence was produced to demonstrate any cash trail, round-tripping arrangement, or movement of unaccounted funds from the company back to the investor entities.

Finding that the Revenue had failed to rebut the documentary evidence furnished by the assessee, the Tribunal concluded that the addition under Section 68 was unsustainable. Thus, it allowed the appeal of Chat Computers Ltd. and directed the Assessing Officer to delete the entire addition, reaffirming that suspicion alone cannot replace evidence in matters involving share capital and share application money.

To Read Full Order, Download PDF Given Below.