Denied Personal Hearing Due to Income Tax Portal Glitch? Madras HC Quashes assessment order:

Madras High Court dismisses income tax assessment order against R.R. International over denial of fair hearing due to technical glitch.
Assessment Order Cancelled Over Portal Glitch

Denied Personal Hearing Due to Income Tax Portal Glitch? Madras HC Quashes assessment order
In a current ruling, the Madras High Court has dismissed an income tax assessment order against R.R. International, a Tirupur-based partnership firm. The court found that the firm was not given a proper chance to present its side during the hearing. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, who presented the ruling on April 15, 2025, said that even in online tax procedures, it is important to follow basic rules of fairness.
Background of the Case
- R.R. International had filed a writ petition raising objections against an assessment order dated March 28, 2024. The assessment order was issued by the National e-Assessment Centre in Delhi under Sections 143(3) and 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 2022–23. The petitioner said that although they submitted timely replies to two show cause notices issued by the department on March 20 and March 24, the interface of the online portal prevented them from requesting a personal hearing due to a technical glitch.
- In reference to the petitioner, the option to ask for a hearing disappeared automatically after they uploaded their reply. Because of this, they missed a significant part of the assessment process.
- The senior panel counsel for the Income Tax Department argued that the online portal clearly told taxpayers to select the video hearing option before sending their reply. Since the petitioner did not follow this step, the system closed the hearing option automatically, and the department went ahead and passed the final order.
- After listening to both sides of the conversation, the court ordered that even if mistakes were made or technical problems were faced by the petitioner, it was still not right to deny them a hearing. The judge said that not giving them a chance to be heard goes against the basic rules of fairness.
- According to the court, it is essential to follow fair procedures. The court highlighted that the tax department should give taxpayers a fair chance to explain their side, especially when the outcome could affect them financially.
- The Madras High Court has dismissed the assessment order dated March 28, 2024, provided, the petitioner is required to pay Rs. 10,000 to the Principal Government Naturopathy Medical College and Hospital.
- The Income Tax Department is required to reopen the portal within two weeks once the proof of payment is submitted.
- The petitioner has been given a time period of 15 days to submit their objections and documents after the portal is reactivated.
- The department must then release a 14-day advance notice for a personal hearing, and a fresh order must be issued after accepting the submission of the petitioner.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








