EPFO Issues New Guidelines to Ensure Fairness and Transparency in Audit Process:

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) has issued new guidelines to promote fairness, transparency, and accuracy in its internal audit process.
EPFO Circular Strengthens Audit Fairness and Accountability

EPFO Issues New Guidelines to Ensure Fairness, Transparency and Accuracy in Audit Process
The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO) under the Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India, has recently issued a circular (No. Audit/PolicymatterCirculars/2025/40), dated October 24, 2025. Through the said circular, EPFO has issued a set of instructions for performing the audit process for ensuring fairness, transparency and accuracy in compliance by the auditee offices/units, internal audit parties (IAPs) and zonal audit committees (ZACs).
During an internal audit, if the Internal Audit Party (IAP) finds any issue or shortcoming (called an audit slip) in an office or unit that involves money and may concern any EPFO officer or employee, the following steps must be followed:
- The audited office/unit must share a copy of the audit slip with the concerned officer/employee, along with all related documents. This gives them a fair chance to explain or provide their comments.
- The concerned officer/employee must send their comments or explanation to the audited office within the given time.
- The audited office/unit should include those comments or explanations when sending its reply to the IAP. This reply should also have a copy of the officer’s comments attached.
- Thereafter, the Internal Audit Party (IAP) will analyse the submitted reply from the audit office and the comments from the concerned officer/employee. Based on that, the IAP will decide on any further actions, like dropping the audit slips/audit engagement conclusions/recommendations (corrective actions) and Draft Audit Report (DAR).
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2460My Recent Articles
- ITAT Strikes Down Entire Reassessment Proceedings Over Unsigned Section 148 NoticePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 271B Penalty, Holds Form 3CD Reporting Error Covered Under Reasonable CausePremium
- A Taxpayer Cannot Be Forced to Pay GST Twice Merely Because Tax Paid Under Wrong Head, Rules High CourtPremium
- ITAT Restores Appeal After Condoning 1,929-Day Delay Caused by Director’s Jail Term and IllnessPremium
- Partial Tax Refund Must Be Adjusted Against Interest First, ITAT Upholds Section 244A Refund Interest ComputationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









