Expiry of E-way bill does not create any scope for evasion; Absent evasion, there can be no revenue loss: HC:

Expiry of E-way bill does not create any scope for evasion; Absent evasion, there can be no revenue loss: HC In this matter the E-Way bill expired du…
E-way bill does not create any scope for evasion

Example 1: Vehicles meant for a vehicle distributor are delivered at the stock yard/ godown/ branch; the transporter possesses the necessary tax invoice, but the E-way bill was generated for principal place of business/different place of business.
In this case the CGST /SGST /IGST (if interstate supply) would have been suffered at the hands of manufacturer or distributor. Mere delivery of the goods at a place other than those mentioned in the documents would not render the transaction as an evasion or abetment of evasion. Being a B 2 B transaction, trail of transaction would now be available in GSTR1 for the department.
Example 2: A conveyance carrying the goods from a factory of fertilizers is delivering the same at various locations as directed by the department of Agriculture. The goods are accompanied by invoice or invoice with delivery challan and E- way bill. The E-way bill has expired due to delay in making delivery at various locations. The expiry of E-way bill does not create any scope for evasion. In cases as in the examples, penalty of upto Rs.5000/- per Act shall be levied.'
In the instant case, from the narrative thus far, it comes closest to Example 2. It is reiterated and clearly articulated in Example 2 that the expiry of E-way bill does not create any scope for evasion. Absent evasion, there can be no revenue loss. It has been made clear that in cases of such nature penalty upto Rs.5,000/- per act shall be levied. This may have to be read with Section 125 of C-G & ST Act, which is residuary in nature qua penalties which do not find a place in the adumbration of (xxi) categories in sub-section (1) of Section 122. In the light of the narrative, discussion and dispositive reasoning thus far, on a demurrer, assuming there was no breakdown and assuming the portal was active, the maximum penalty would be Rs.5,000/- qua paragraph 10 of said Circular and therefore as a sequitur, the following order is passed:(i) The present impugned order dated 08.12.2022 bearing reference GDN No.4554/2022-23 made by the second respondent is set aside;
(ii) The impugned proceedings dated 02.12.2022 is set aside albeit with a directive that the writ petitioner shall pay a penalty of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) as per paragraph 10 of said Circular dated 31.05.2019 latest by tomorrow;
(iii) On payment of penalty in the aforesaid manner latest by tomorrow, the second respondent shall release the truck bearing Registration No.TN28-AQ-9203 forthwith with the consignment.
Click here to DownloadAbout Author

CA Pratibha Goyal
Co Founder
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1486My Recent Articles
- Biggest Labour Reform in Indian History: 4 Labour Codes Effective from today
- Tax Audit and ITR Due date not extended in this case: Know More
- Government notifies Agreement and Protocol between India and Qatar [Read Notification]
- CA Breaking: Results of ICAI Examination to be announced soon, Know probable Date
- Breaking: GSTR-3B Due Date for September 2025 extended by CBIC amid Diwali Festivities
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts










