Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Filing of Form 67: ITAT Delhi:

Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Filing of Form 67: ITAT Delhi

The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee to claim a foreign tax credit which was denied by the Income Tax Department.

ITAT Allows Foreign Tax Credit Despite Delayed Filing of Form 67

authorNidhidateSep 30, 2025
Last update on Sep 30, 2025
Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Filing of Form 67: ITAT Delhi The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi has ruled in favour of an assessee by allowing him to claim the foreign tax credit, which was denied by the Income Tax Department.
ITAT Partly Allows Appeal: Restricts Addition on Bogus Creditors to 25%
The assessee, Shri Puneet Khanna, filed his Income Tax Return for AY 2020-21, reporting a total income of Rs 1,52,67,570 and claiming a refund of Rs 96,480. He also claimed the double taxation relief of Rs 65,986 under Section 90 of the Income Tax Act for the foreign income. However, he filed the Form 67, which is required to claim double taxation relief under section 90 of the Act, after the due date. Therefore, the Central Processing Centre (CPC) disallowed the double taxation relief claim and also did not allow TDS/TCS credit of Rs 1,50,114, raising a tax demand of Rs 1,58,830. The assessee filed a rectification request under section 154 of the Act, but the CPC did not rectify the intimation and continued to raise the demand. The assessee again filed a rectification, and this time, CPC rectified the order and allowed him to claim the TDS and TCS benefit, but did not allow him to claim the double taxation relief under section Aggrieved, the assessee appealed to the CIT(A), but it upheld the CPC decision. Therefore, the assessee approached the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that Form No. 67 filing is not compulsory, but it is a directory held by the Tribunal in many other orders.
ITAT Remands Additions on Property, Bank Credits & Mutual Fund Investments
The ITAT observed the ruling in the tribunal case of Brinda Rama Krishna in ITA No. 454/Bang/2021 for AY 2018-19, which held that:
  • Rule 128(9) does not provide for the disallowance of FTC for delay.
  • Filing Form 67 is a directory, not a mandatory requirement.
  • DTAA provisions override the Income Tax Act. So, the delayed filing of Form 67 is not fatal to the claim for FTC.
The ITAT Delhi followed this order and partly allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes. It directed the AO to allow the assessee to claim a foreign tax credit.

About Author

Nidhi

Content Writer

Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833
Up Next

Loading suggestions…