Form-C Benefit Rejection Without Sharing Negative Report to Appellant Violates Natural Justice: Gujarat HC

The High Court agreed with the contentions of the appellant, observing that the negative reports received by the department were not shared with the appellant, resulting in the violation of natural justice.

HC Sets Aside ITAT's Order for Violating Natural Justice

Nidhi | Feb 7, 2026 |

Form-C Benefit Rejection Without Sharing Negative Report to Appellant Violates Natural Justice: Gujarat HC

Form-C Benefit Rejection Without Sharing Negative Report to Appellant Violates Natural Justice: Gujarat HC

The Gujarat High Court quashed the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the First Appellate Authority for violating the principles of natural justice.

The appellant company, Shreeji Vitrified Pvt. Ltd., had claimed benefits of a concessional rate of tax on interstate sales through Form C. The appellant submitted several documents, such as Form-402, copies of transport receipts, and copies of tax invoices, to prove the genuineness of the interstate sales transactions. However, the first appellate authority rejected the claim of Form C to the tune of Rs 92,30,891, relying on the negative report shared by the corresponding states and also on the ground that Form C was not reconciled on the TINXSYS website.

The appellant approached the Tribunal, which rejected the appeal filed by the assessee. Therefore, the assessee filed an appeal before the Gujarat High Court, arguing that the tribunal did not apply its mind and ignored the assessee’s contentions that the negative report, based on which the claim was rejected, was never shared with the appellant.

The High Court agreed with the contentions of the appellant, observing that the negative reports received by the department were not shared with the appellant, resulting in the violation of natural justice. The Court also noted that the tribunal had rejected the appeal without considering the assessee’s submission and without recording any reasons.

The Court ruled that the authority must always submit copies of the negative reply to the appellant before passing the order. Since the first appellate authority had failed to submit a copy of such a report and the ITAT also failed to consider the assessee’s contentions, the court set aside both orders and remanded the matter to the first appellate authority.

The First Appellate Authority was directed to pass a new order after hearing the appellant’s contentions and sharing a copy of the negative report.

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
Company Faces Penalty for Non-Filing Form MGT-14 for approving financial statements Interest and Penalty Cannot Go Beyond Show Cause Notice: Allahabad High Court Supply of Masala Paan with Principal Supply as Betel Leaf Not Composite Supply: AAR Clarifies Income Tax Department to Invoke GAAR Against Jane Street for Alleged Tax Evasion RBI Announces Proposal to Compensate Fraud Victims Up to Rs 25,000View All Posts