Gauhati High Court Quashes GST Recovery Notice Over Lack of Prior Hearing:

The Gauhati High Court set aside the GST recovery notice and earlier order, directing fresh proceedings after giving the taxpayer a proper opportunity to respond.
HC Grants Taxpayer Fresh Opportunity to Reply

Gauhati High Court Quashes GST Recovery Notice Over Lack of Prior Hearing
The Gauhati High Court held in favour of the taxpayer by setting aside the impugned recovery notice and sent the case back to the GST authorities for a fresh start, citing a contravention of the principles of natural justice.
The petitioner, Indra Konwar, had raised a key argument that during the personal hearing, he was not issued any intimation of any nature prior to the issuance of the impugned recovery notice dated December 22, 2025. Hence, he only became aware of the tax proceedings on receipt of the recovery notice.
However, the tax authorities claimed the petitioner was indeed served with the final order earlier by registered post; however, they were not sure if the order was successfully delivered. Later, the petitioner had also obtained a copy of the order through a Right to Information (RTI) application.
When the court heard both sides, it noted that the petitioner was not granted a proper opportunity of hearing before taking the final action, which is an explicit violation of the principles of natural justice. The court highlighted that giving a fair chance to reply is a key aspect of legal procedure.
Considering the aforementioned findings, the court quashed the impugned recovery notice dated December 22, 2025, and an earlier issued order dated February 01, 2023, and remanded the case back to the tax authorities for fresh consideration.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2701My Recent Articles
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
- ITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment FailurePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








