Govt Authorises officers who can initiate legal action for contraventions under Social Security Code, 2020:

The Ministry of Labour and Employment has authorised designated officials to regulate and initiate prosecution proceedings under the Code on Social Security, 2020 within their respective jurisdictions.
Labour Ministry Empowers Senior Officials for Prosecution Proceedings

Govt Authorises officers who can initiate legal action for contraventions under Social Security Code, 2020
The Ministry of Labour and Employment under the Government of India has authorised several officials appointed under subsection (7) of Section 24 of Chapter IV of the Social Security Code, 2020, to regulate the initiation of prosecution proceedings under the said Code.
The Central Government has taken this decision in exercise of its powers granted under Section 137 of the Code on Social Security, 2020 (36 of 2020), and officially announced it through a Notification No. S.O. 2361(E), dated May 08, 2026.
The provisions of the said section provide the government authority to decide which officers can initiate legal action for contraventions under the law. This move is aimed at streamlining the process of starting prosecution proceedings under the said Code.
In reference to the notification, the officials, including the Insurance Commissioner, Additional Commissioner, Regional Director Grade ‘A’/Director, Regional Director Grade ‘B’/Joint Director, Deputy Director, Assistant Director, etc., have been empowered for the purposes of regulating the initiation of prosecution proceedings under the Social Security Code, 2020.
The powers granted to these officials will apply only within their respective territorial and functional jurisdictions. Meaning, no officer can exercise this authority outside the area and role assigned to them by the government.
Refer to the official notification for complete information.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2450My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 12 Lakh Section 68 Addition After Assessee Proves Lender’s Identity, Creditworthiness and Genuine TransactionPremium
- ITAT Holds Approval Should Be Taken from PCCIT under Section 151(ii) When Section 148 Notice Is After 3-Year Time LimitPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside CIT(E)’s Rejection of Charitable Trust’s Section 12AB Registration and 80G Approval ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Upholds Section 148 Reopening But Restricts Rs 30 Lakh Accommodation Entry Addition To 5%, Cites Double TaxationPremium
- Claiming Full TDS Credit Without Reporting Entire Income Is Underreporting, Not Misreporting: ITAT Premium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








