GST: Can a single composite Order to company and it’s Managing Director survive?

The Telangana High Court ruled that a Managing Director without GST registration is entitled to a temporary identification number to appeal a personal penalty. The Court ordered the tax authorities to issue separate revised summary orders for the company and the individual to rectify a procedural hurdle that had previously blocked his right to a separate legal challenge.

GST: Can a single composite Order to company and it’s Managing Director survive?
Facts of the case:-
After a tax investigation, the authorities issued an order on December 30, 2025, that hit both Sugna Metal Limited and its Managing Director, Bharat Kumar Agarwal, with heavy penalties.
The order demanded over ₹2.2 crore for wrongly claimed tax credits and another ₹38 lakh for passing on credits without actually supplying goods. Because the tax office grouped the company and the Managing Director together in one single summary document (Form DRC-07), Mr. Agarwal found himself in a legal jam.
Since he isn't personally registered for GST, he had no way to use the official system to file his own separate appeal against the ₹2.59 crore personal penalty they charged him. Essentially, he was being held personally liable but was blocked from defending himself in court because of a paperwork technicality.
Issue Involved In This Case
Whether a Managing Director who lacks personal GST registration be granted a temporary registration number to exercise their right to appeal, especially when a single composite order (Form GST DRC-07) was issued against both them and their company, effectively blocking them from filing a separate legal challenge?
Decision Of The Court :-
The Telangana High Court ruled that the Managing Director can request a temporary identification number under Rule 16A of the CGST (Amendment) Rules, 2025, affirming his right to appeal.
The Court ordered tax authorities to issue two separate revised summary orders in Form GST DRC-07—one for the Company and one for the Managing Director—within two weeks.
The appeal period will start only after these new orders are issued. Mr. Agarwal must apply for temporary registration within one week, and the authority must grant it within a week thereafter.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2420My Recent Articles
- Bona Fide Mistake in ITR Cannot Deny Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer a Final Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.27 Crore Cash Deposits Under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Restores Appeals for Fresh Consideration After NFAC Denied Request of Personal Hearing Through Video ConferencingPremium
- ITAT Condones 97-Day Delay, Restores Appeal After CIT(A) Sent Hearing Notices to Wrong Email AddressPremium
- MCA Appoints Justice (Retd.) Yogesh Khanna as Officiating Chairperson of NCLAT for Three Months
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








