GST leviable on Private Coaching Institutes imparting education to CA, CS, CMA etc.

GST leviable on Private Coaching Institutes imparting education to CA, CS, CMA etc. The Kerala Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (“the KAAAR”) i…

GST leviable on Private Coaching Institutes imparting education to CA, CS, CMA etc.
The Kerala Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (“the KAAAR”) in matter of M/s Logic Management Training Institutes Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. AAAR/13/21 dated May 05, 2021] upholds the Order No. KER/76/2019 dated May 20, 2021, (“Impugned Order”) passed by Authority for Advance Ruling (“the AAR”) holding that the private coaching institutions (the assessee) imparting education to students facilitating them to obtain qualification like CA,CS, CMA etc., are not covered under the definition of ‘educational institution’ in para 2(y) of the Services Exemption Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 (“Services Exemption Notification”) and hence not eligible to exemption under the Central Good and Services Act (“the CGST Act”).
Facts:
The petition is filed by the M/s Logic Management Training Institutes Pvt. Ltd. (“the Petitioner”) against the Impugned Order passed by the AAR (“the Respondent”) challenging the legality, correctness and propriety of the Impugned Order. The Petitioner is an institute imparting coaching to the students to facilitate them to obtain qualification such as Chartered Accountant (“CA”), Company Secretary (“CS”), Certified Management Accountant (“CMA”) etc.
The Petitioner is providing educational services based on the curriculum published by the recognized institutions and prescribed by law and is, therefore, eligible for exemption from Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) as per Sl. No. 66 of Service Exemption Notification. The Petitioner further contends that since principal supply is exempted from GST, the other services that are ancillary to the same are also exempted from GST.
Issues:
- Whether the education programme and training being offered by the Petitioner is exempted as per the Service Exemption Notification to a limited class of students of the Government recognized institutes and universities (“Govt. Institutions”) or all the students studying directly or indirectly in these Govt. Institutions since the Petitioner is giving lecture classes and notes including printed books published by Govt. Institutions and universities based on the specific syllabus (curriculum) published by these Govt. Institutions?
- Whether nature of service imparting by the Petitioner should be classified under the Service Accounting Code (“SAC”) 9992-999293 as commercial training and coaching services?
- Whether there should be any tax liability under the CGST Act as work of an agent by the Petitioner for collecting and transferring examination fees and other fees of the recognized institutes and universities on behalf of students studying in the Petitioner’s institute?
- Whether there is any tax liability on the hostel fees of less than Rs 200/- per day per person including food and at a monthly rate of maximum Rs 6000/- from its own students?
- Whether there is any tax liability on the Petitioner for selling textbooks to its students as the books are covered under exempted goods?
- Observed that, the Petitioner is not qualified to be classified as an ‘educational institution’ within the meaning assigned and covered vide para 2(y)(ii) of Service Exemption Notification. Opined that by the applying the settled law of strict interpretation of taxing statute, the coaching or training service provided by the Petitioner to the students is not the service provided by means of ‘education as a part of curriculum prescribed for obtaining a qualification recognized by law for the time being in force’ as envisaged under Entry 66 of the Service Exemption Notification for exemption from GST. The coaching/training imparted by the Petitioner to CA/CMA aspiring students (for appearing and qualifying in the respective examinations) would not lead to grant of certificate/qualification recognized by law. Instead, all the aspirants are required to take a separate set of examinations conducted by the said recognized institutions like ICAI, ICWA etc., for acquiring certificate or degree recognized by law. The training/coaching imparted by the Petitioner might be helping the aspirants to clear the test/examinations organized by the recognized institutions but not per se lead to grant of any certificate or degree as such recognized by law.
- SAC of the services rendered by the Petitioner –
- Whether there is any GST liability on the Petitioner for collecting and transferring examinations fees and other fees to the recognized institutes or universities on behalf of the students study at their institute?
- Tax liability on Hostel Fees – the Petitioner offers hostel facility to its students at a rate of less than ₹ 200/- per day per person including food and at a monthly rate of maximum ₹ 6000/- -
- Tax liability on the Petitioner for selling text books to its students –
- Upholds the Impugned order passed by the AAR.
- Pre-school education and education up to higher secondary or equivalent; or
- Education as a part of an approved vocational education course.”
- The tax liability on a composite or a mixed supply shall be determined in the following manner, namely:-
About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Up Next
Loading suggestions…









