Gujarat High Court Condones 372-Day Delay in Tax Appeal, Accepts Bona Fide Belief of Pending Case:

The Gujarat HC condoned a 372-day delay in filing a tax appeal after accepting the appellant’s bona fide belief that a similar matter was already pending before the Court.
High Court Condoned Delay in Filing Tax Appeal

Gujarat High Court Condones 372-Day Delay in Tax Appeal, Accepts Bona Fide Belief of Pending Case
The Gujarat High Court condoned a 372-day delay in filing the tax appeal against the tax department. Accepting the bona fide explanation, the Court directed registration and listing of the appeal for further hearing.
The High Court of Gujarat has announced its judgement on an appeal filed by Dudhsagar Research and Development Association against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) Circle 1, Ahmedabad. The appeal was filed challenging an order dated April 17, 2023, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in ITA No. 1671/Ahd/2019. The case pertains to the Assessment Year 2015-16.
The present appeal was filed 372 days late. The allowed time limit to file a tax appeal was 120 days from the date of receiving the impugned order. The appellant explained that a similar tax appeal (Tax Appeal No. 104 of 2023) for the assessment year 2014-15 had already been filed on February 06, 2023, and accepted on August 21, 2023.
Believing that the issue had already been resolved earlier, the applicant unintentionally delayed filing the present appeal. Once the mistake was noticed, the appeal was filed immediately. The applicant claims that it was a genuine mistake under a bona fide impression that the case was already pending before the Court. However, the tax department prayed the court that the delay should not be condoned.
The Court, comprising Honourable Justice A.S. Supehia and Justice Pranav Trivedi, after analysing arguments raised from both sides, found the reasons given by the applicant satisfactory. Considering the same, the court condoned the delay of 372 days in filing the tax appeal in the interest of justice. The Court allowed the application and directed the Registry to assign a regular number to the appeal and list it in order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








