HC Directs Disbursement of GST Refund Interest; Assessee Not to Suffer Due to Centre-State Dispute

Interest on refund deposited before Court; inter se dispute between Central and State authorities cannot delay payment to taxpayer.

GST Refund Interest Cannot Be Withheld Due to Centre–State Dispute

Meetu Kumari | Feb 27, 2026 |

HC Directs Disbursement of GST Refund Interest; Assessee Not to Suffer Due to Centre-State Dispute

HC Directs Disbursement of GST Refund Interest; Assessee Not to Suffer Due to Centre-State Dispute

Messrs Meghmani Organics Ltd. & Anr. filed a writ petition before the High Court of Gujarat seeking payment of interest on a GST refund. During earlier hearings, the Court noted an inter se dispute between the State GST and Central GST authorities regarding which authority was liable to pay interest.

The respondents relied on Rule 94 of the CGST Rules and the definition of “proper officer” under Section 2(91) of the CGST Act to contend that liability lay with the State authorities. The Court directed respondent No. 3 to deposit the entire interest amount with the Registry. The amount was duly deposited, and it was undisputed that the petitioner was entitled to interest.

Issue Before HC: Whether entitlement to interest on GST refund can be denied or delayed due to an internal dispute between Central and State GST authorities regarding liability.

HC’s Ruling: The Court held that the petitioner could not be made to suffer on account of an internal dispute between authorities. The Court clarified that it was not concerned with how liability was to be apportioned between the Centre and the State.

As the petitioner’s entitlement to interest was undisputed, payment could not be withheld merely because the authorities were shifting responsibility between themselves. Thus, the Registry was directed to disburse the deposited interest amount to the petitioner after due verification.

The writ petition was disposed of, leaving the inter se dispute between the authorities open to be resolved independently.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ITAT: Dolly Khanna’s Rs 54.23 Crore Short-Term Capital Loss Cannot Be Treated as Business Loss Merely Due to High Volume Share Transactions ITAT Cuts Estimated Profit from 15% to 0.5% in Newspaper Publishing Business ITAT Directs Inclusion and Exclusion of Comparables in TP Analysis Gauhati HC Directs Tata Projects to Pursue GST Appellate Remedies; Extends Interim Protection Kerala High Court Quashes Rs 1.31 Crore GST Demand; Holds ISD Registration Was Not Mandatory Before 2025View All Posts