HC Directs Disbursement of GST Refund Interest; Assessee Not to Suffer Due to Centre-State Dispute:

HC Directs Disbursement of GST Refund Interest; Assessee Not to Suffer Due to Centre-State Dispute

Interest on refund deposited before Court; inter se dispute between Central and State authorities cannot delay payment to taxpayer.

GST Refund Interest Cannot Be Withheld Due to Centre–State Dispute

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 27, 2026
Last update on Feb 27, 2026
HC Directs Disbursement of GST Refund Interest; Assessee Not to Suffer Due to Centre-State Dispute Messrs Meghmani Organics Ltd. & Anr. filed a writ petition before the High Court of Gujarat seeking payment of interest on a GST refund. During earlier hearings, the Court noted an inter se dispute between the State GST and Central GST authorities regarding which authority was liable to pay interest.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The respondents relied on Rule 94 of the CGST Rules and the definition of “proper officer” under Section 2(91) of the CGST Act to contend that liability lay with the State authorities. The Court directed respondent No. 3 to deposit the entire interest amount with the Registry. The amount was duly deposited, and it was undisputed that the petitioner was entitled to interest. Issue Before HC: Whether entitlement to interest on GST refund can be denied or delayed due to an internal dispute between Central and State GST authorities regarding liability.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
HC's Ruling: The Court held that the petitioner could not be made to suffer on account of an internal dispute between authorities. The Court clarified that it was not concerned with how liability was to be apportioned between the Centre and the State. As the petitioner’s entitlement to interest was undisputed, payment could not be withheld merely because the authorities were shifting responsibility between themselves. Thus, the Registry was directed to disburse the deposited interest amount to the petitioner after due verification. The writ petition was disposed of, leaving the inter se dispute between the authorities open to be resolved independently. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…