ITAT Remands Rs 32.68 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposit Case Over Rule 46A Violation:
The ITAT remanded a Rs 32.68 crore unexplained cash deposit case after holding that the CIT(A) admitted additional evidence without obtaining the Assessing Officer's mandatory remand report under Rule 46A.
ITAT Orders Fresh Hearing in Rs 32.68 Cr Case
Vanshika verma
Aug 5, 2026
Premium
ITAT Remands Rs 32.68 Crore Unexplained Cash Deposit Case Over Rule 46A Violation
The ITAT remanded a Rs 32.68 crore unexplained cash deposit case after holding that the CIT(A) admitted additional evidence without obtaining the Assessing Officer's mandatory remand report under Rule 46A.
Also Read
Tax Dispute Over Cash, Jewellery and Property Deals Gets Fresh Lease of Life as ITAT Orders ReconsiderationITAT Holds Stamp Duty Value Cannot Override Pre-Existing Land Sale AgreementITAT Holds Repeated Notices Seeking Same Information Cannot Automatically Constitute Separate DefaultsITAT Restores Appeal Over Rs 9.33 Crore Section 68 Share Application Addition After DTVSV Payment Failure
About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1869My Recent Articles
- Tax Dispute Over Cash, Jewellery and Property Deals Gets Fresh Lease of Life as ITAT Orders ReconsiderationPremium
- ITAT Holds Repeated Notices Seeking Same Information Cannot Automatically Constitute Separate DefaultsPremium
- Online Betting GST Case: DGGI Hyderabad Conducts Searches at Fintech Firms in Three Cities, Seizes Documents and Digital Records
- ITAT Gives Fresh Opportunity for Section 80G(5) Approval, Holds Wrong Clause Selection in Form 10AB Is Only a Technical ErrorPremium
- ITAT Relief to Vodafone Distributor: Rs 1.50 Lakh Penalty for Non-Audit of Books DeletedPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts