HC Grants Bail in Rs. 21.89 Crore Fake ITC Case Under CGST Act:

Court grants bail citing custody period, co-accused parity, and substantial completion of GST investigation
Bail Allowed Considering Custody Duration and Parity With Co-accused

HC Grants Bail in Rs. 21.89 Crore Fake ITC Case Under CGST Act
The petitioner, arrayed as Accused No.2, approached the High Court seeking regular bail in a GST anti-evasion case involving alleged wrongful availment of input tax credit (ITC) worth Rs. 21.89 crore through fake invoices. He was arrested on 28.01.2026 and had been in judicial custody since 29.01.2026. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the offence had been incorrectly treated as non-bailable.
He also pointed out that a co-accused had already been granted bail and that most of the investigation had already been completed, making further detention unnecessary. The prosecution opposed the plea, stressing the seriousness of the offence under the CGST Act and contending that the case involved non-bailable provisions. It was also argued that the investigation was still ongoing.
Issue Raised: Whether the petitioner in a fake ITC case under the CGST Act is entitled to regular bail considering custody period and parity with co-accused.
HC Held: The High Court allowed the bail application, noting that the petitioner had already spent a significant period in judicial custody. It also took into account that a co-accused had been granted bail, making parity a relevant consideration.
The Court observed that the investigation had progressed substantially, reducing the need for further custodial interrogation. In such circumstances, continued detention was not justified. Therefore, the petitioner was granted regular bail subject to conditions, including furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, appearing before GST authorities as required, and complying with all statutory conditions.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2214My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones Delay, Allows BSNL VRS Tax Exemption Under Section 10(10B)Premium
- ITAT Deletes Rs 30 Lakh Penalty Over Defective Section 274 NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 7 Lakh Addition for Fresh Verification of Loan SourcePremium
- ITAT Deletes Addition, Accepts Agricultural Income as Source of Land InvestmentPremium
- ITAT Condones 433-Day Delay, Restores Section 54F and Capital Gains IssuesPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








