HC Holds Section 62 GST Assessment Void After Return Filing:

HC Holds Section 62 GST Assessment Void After Return Filing

HC rules best judgement assessment lapses once returns are filed and dues are fully paid.

Assessment Withdrawn Automatically Upon Filing Returns and Clearing Tax Dues

authorMeetu KumaridateApr 20, 2026
Last update on Apr 20, 2026
HC Holds Section 62 GST Assessment Void After Return Filing The petitioner, M/s Andra Canteen Private Limited, was subjected to two best judgement assessment orders dated 05.12.2024 under Section 62 of the GST Act for the periods July 2024 and September 2024. Subsequently, the department issued a demand notice and a garnishee notice seeking recovery of tax amounts. The petitioner approached the High Court, contending that it had already filed the pending returns for both periods, July 2024 on 22.03.2025 and September 2024 on 19.05.2025, along with payment of tax, interest, and late fee. Despite this, recovery proceedings were initiated. The Revenue, on instructions, acknowledged before the Court that the entire dues had been cleared.
HC Sets Aside GST Assessment Order Covering Multiple Financial Years
Main Issue: Whether assessment orders passed under Section 62 of the GST Act can continue to operate once the taxpayer files returns and pays the entire tax due, along with applicable interest and late fees. HC's Decision: The High Court allowed the writ petition and held that once the petitioner had filed the returns and discharged the entire tax liability along with interest and late fee, the assessment order passed under Section 62 would automatically stand withdrawn in terms of Section 62(2) of the GST Act.
ITAT Delhi Quashes Reassessment Due to Invalid Approval Under Section 151
The Court observed that the continuation of recovery proceedings, including the garnishee notice, was unjustified after full compliance by the assessee. Therefore, it declared that the assessment order for September 2024 shall be deemed withdrawn and restrained the authorities from initiating or continuing any coercive recovery action. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…