HC: Sets aside clarificatory circular taking away assesse’s substantive right by denying exemption on fish meal

  • Home
  • HC: Sets aside clarificatory circular taking away assesse’s substantive right by denying exemption on fish meal

CA Bimal Jain | Nov 19, 2021 | Views 294757

HC: Sets aside clarificatory circular taking away assesse’s substantive right by denying exemption on fish meal

HC: Sets aside clarificatory circular taking away assesse’s substantive right by denying exemption on fish meal

In Jenefa India vs. Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(MD) No.16770/2019 decided on October 5, 2021] Hon’ble Madras High Court upheld the validity of Sl. No.102 of Notification No. 2/2017 dated June 28, 2017 (“Goods Exemption Notification”) over Clause (ii) of Circular No. 80/54/2018-GST (“Clarification Circular”) in case where M/s Jenefa India (“the Petitioner”) is a manufacturer of finished product, fish meal.

Department contended that the Petitioner is a manufacturer of fish meal which is also used as a raw material for the purpose of making taxable goods namely, cattle/poultry/aquatic feed and does not fall under the ambit of Goods Exemption Notification.

The Hon’ble Madras High Court observed that, merely because a finished product manufactured by the Petitioner is also used as a raw material for purpose of further manufacturing of animal feed or poultry feed, it cannot be stated that, it is only a raw material and not a finished product.

Observed that, the exemption provided by the Govt. by exercising its powers either under Section 11(1) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) or under Section 6(1) of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the IGST Act”) are the substantive rights – such kind of exemptions cannot be taken away or done away by issuing Clarification Circulars by the board, which must be procedural in nature as not the scenario in the present case.

Held that, Clarification Circular issued in terms of Section 168 (1) of CGST Act cannot override the exemption provided under the Goods Exemption Notification.

Held that, right to get exemption available by virtue of Goods Exemption Notification cannot be taken away from the Petitioner by issuing a circular under Section 168 of the CGST Act and further observed that such circulars are issued only to the benefit of the officials and staff of the department.

Held that, as long as Petitioner manufactures the finished product, fish meal, it can enjoy the benefit of exemption provided under Goods Exemption Notification.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

To Read the Judgment Download PDF Given Below :

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button

Join Membership

In case of Any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's What's App Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio

My Recent Articles

Non-submission of receipt of electricity bill is not a ground of rejection of application for GST registration GST not applicable on payment of notice pay and allowed ITC on canteen services Anticipatory bail is a statutory right and custodial interrogation is neither warranted nor provided under the CGST Act TDS credit to be allowed to Employee even if not deposited by the Employer Hon’ble High Court ordered the GST Authority to reimburse GST paid under the incorrect heading View All Posts

Leave a Reply