High Court Dismisses CGST Appeal on Maintainability; Directs Revenue to Supreme Court:

High Court Dismisses CGST Appeal on Maintainability; Directs Revenue to Supreme Court

High Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over "Taxability" Disputes; Remedy Lies Under Section 35L

HC: Service Tax Taxability Appeals Not Maintainable Under Section 35G, Remedy Lies Before Supreme Court

authorMeetu KumaridateMar 6, 2026
Last update on Mar 6, 2026
High Court Dismisses CGST Appeal on Maintainability; Directs Revenue to Supreme Court The Principal Commissioner of CGST (Delhi South Commissionerate) filed an appeal against M/S Bureau of Energy Efficiency. The Revenue challenged a previous decision regarding the taxability of services. During the hearing, the Respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
It was argued that since the core dispute pertained to the "taxability" of a service and the determination of its rate or value for assessment, the High Court was not the appropriate forum under the statutory framework of the Central Excise Act (as applicable to Service Tax/CGST matters). Issue Raised: Whether an appeal involving the determination of a question having a relation to the rate of duty or the value of goods/services for purposes of assessment is maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944. HC's Order: The Hon'ble High Court upheld the preliminary objection and dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. The Division Bench clarified that under Section 35G, the High Court is barred from hearing appeals that involve questions of "taxability" or "rate of duty."
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The Court held that the exclusive remedy for such disputes lies in an appeal to the Supreme Court of India under Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944. However, the Court granted liberty to the Revenue to approach the Apex Court and noted that the time spent prosecuting this appeal could be considered for the condonation of delay if the issue of limitation arises. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2220
Up Next

Loading suggestions…