High Court Upholds Rs. 3.90 Lakh Decree in Landlord-Tenant Commercial Dispute:

No Appellate Interference Warranted Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act; Tenants’ Appeal Dismissed
Court Finds No Perversity in Commercial Court’s Decision to Partially Decree Recovery

High Court Upholds Rs. 3.90 Lakh Decree in Landlord-Tenant Commercial Dispute
The Appellants, M/S Ritas Heritage & Others, filed an appeal against a judgment and decree dated January 11, 2023, passed by a Commercial Court. The original suit was filed by the Respondents (landlords) for the recovery of arrears of rent, mesne profits, and other dues related to a commercial property.
The Commercial Court had partly decreed the suit in favor of the landlords, awarding them a sum of Rs. 3,90,163 along with 6% interest per annum and litigation costs. The tenants challenged this recovery, arguing against the findings and the calculated amounts.
Main Issue: Whether the judgment of the Commercial Court warrants interference by the High Court based on any illegality, perversity, or patent error in its reasoning regarding the recovery of commercial dues from the tenants.
HC's Decision: The Hon'ble High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Commercial Court's judgment in its entirety. The Court that the scope of the appeal was confined to whether the findings against the tenants were sustainable.
Relying on the decision of the Supreme Court of India in Siri Chand (Dead) through Legal Representatives v. Surinder Singh, it held that an escalation clause operating during a subsisting tenancy does not, by itself, render the lease compulsorily registrable. However, since the landlords had not filed any appeal or cross-objection, the Court declined to modify the award.
The High Court held that the reasoning adopted by the Commercial Court was sound and free from any legal perversity or patent error. Thus, the decree for recovery stood confirmed.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2220My Recent Articles
- ITAT: Carbon Credit Receipts Are Capital, Not Taxable Under Income TaxPremium
- Gujarat HC Quashes Section 148 Notice After Reassessment Proceedings Were DroppedPremium
- High Court Denies GST Refund After Delayed Tribunal Appeal Beyond Section 112 TimelinePremium
- ITAT Allows Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation Despite Return OmissionPremium
- High Court Refuses Interference in Anti-Dumping Duty Matter Due to Alternative RemedyPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
Recent Posts

All Posts








