High Court Upholds Rs. 3.90 Lakh Decree in Landlord-Tenant Commercial Dispute:

High Court Upholds Rs. 3.90 Lakh Decree in Landlord-Tenant Commercial Dispute

No Appellate Interference Warranted Under Section 13 of Commercial Courts Act; Tenants’ Appeal Dismissed

Court Finds No Perversity in Commercial Court’s Decision to Partially Decree Recovery

authorMeetu KumaridateMar 5, 2026
Last update on Mar 5, 2026
High Court Upholds Rs. 3.90 Lakh Decree in Landlord-Tenant Commercial Dispute The Appellants, M/S Ritas Heritage & Others, filed an appeal against a judgment and decree dated January 11, 2023, passed by a Commercial Court. The original suit was filed by the Respondents (landlords) for the recovery of arrears of rent, mesne profits, and other dues related to a commercial property. The Commercial Court had partly decreed the suit in favor of the landlords, awarding them a sum of Rs. 3,90,163 along with 6% interest per annum and litigation costs. The tenants challenged this recovery, arguing against the findings and the calculated amounts.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Main Issue: Whether the judgment of the Commercial Court warrants interference by the High Court based on any illegality, perversity, or patent error in its reasoning regarding the recovery of commercial dues from the tenants. HC's Decision: The Hon'ble High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Commercial Court's judgment in its entirety. The Court that the scope of the appeal was confined to whether the findings against the tenants were sustainable.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Relying on the decision of the Supreme Court of India in Siri Chand (Dead) through Legal Representatives v. Surinder Singh, it held that an escalation clause operating during a subsisting tenancy does not, by itself, render the lease compulsorily registrable. However, since the landlords had not filed any appeal or cross-objection, the Court declined to modify the award. The High Court held that the reasoning adopted by the Commercial Court was sound and free from any legal perversity or patent error. Thus, the decree for recovery stood confirmed. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

LinkedIn

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2220
Up Next

Loading suggestions…