Hindustan Unilever Held Guilty of GST Profiteering By National Anti-Profiteering Authority :

Hindustan Unilever Held Guilty of GST Profiteering By National Anti-Profiteering Authority

The NAA finds Hindustan Unilever Limited failed to pass on GST rate reduction benefits to consumers.

NAA Orders Deposit of Rs 383.35 Crore

authorSaimadateAug 22, 2026
Last update on Aug 22, 2026

The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has held Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL) guilty of profiteering by failing to pass on the benefit of GST rate reductions to consumers. The Authority found that HUL increased the base prices of products despite GST rates being reduced from 28% to 18% and from 18% to 12% with effect from November 15, 2017.

ITAT Rules Reassessment Notice Issued by ITO Invalid for Taxpayer With Income Above Rs 20 Lakh, Holds Proceedings Void Ab Initio

The proceedings arose from complaints alleging that HUL had not passed on the benefit of GST rate reductions introduced with effect from November 15, 2017. The applicants alleged that although GST on several products was reduced, HUL retained the existing MRPs by increasing the base prices of its products.

The matter was referred by the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering to the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) for investigation. The DGAP examined HUL's sales and pricing data for the period from November 15, 2017 to February 28, 2018 and concluded that the company had resorted to profiteering.

ROC Imposes Penalty on Company and Director for Failure to Furnish Financial Statements for FY 2021-22

The NAA noted that HUL had increased the base prices of products after the GST rate reductions, thereby keeping the selling prices at the pre-reduction level or failing to reduce them accordingly. The Authority determined the profiteering due to denial of the GST benefit at Rs 455.92 crore, apart from Rs 78.97 crore of TRAN-2 credit, taking the total amount of profiteering to Rs 534.89 crore. Consequently, the Authority confirmed Rs 383.35 crore as the amount of benefit denied to customers.

Accordingly, the Authority held that HUL had committed an offence under Section 122(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017 by issuing incorrect invoices to customers. Since HUL had been found guilty of profiteering and violation of Section 122(1)(i), the Authority directed that a fresh notice be issued to the company to explain why penalty should not be imposed.

Woman Tax Consultant Held for Rs 66 Lakh Fraud Using Fake Income Tax Receipts

Applying Rule 133(3)(c) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the NAA directed HUL to deposit 50% of Rs 383.35 crore, i.e. Rs 191.68 crore, in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund and the remaining amount in the Consumer Welfare Funds of the concerned States.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
327
Up Next

Loading suggestions…