Hindustan Zinc penalized by Custom Authorities: Plans to File Appeal:

Hindustan Zinc Limited receives a customs order over import valuation for FY 2019-20, plans to appeal, and expects no major financial impact.
Customs Order Issued Over Import Valuation

Hindustan Zinc penalized by Custom Authorities: Plans to File Appeal
Hindustan Zinc Limited has issued an official disclosure dated July 08, 2025, under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“SEBI Listing Regulations”), addressing the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), informing them that it has recently received an order from the Office of the Commissioner of Customs, NS-I, Maharashtra.
The order (Order No. 410/2025-26/JC/Gr. II (C-F)/NS-I/CAC/JNCH) dated July 02, 2025, received by the company on July 7, 2025, at 5:00 PM, from the Office of the Commissioner of Customs, NS-I, Maharashtra, confirmed the fine and penalty of Rs. 12,76,941, in addition to the customs duty demand and applicable interest under customs laws. This order deals with the subject of the valuation of certain goods that were imported by the company in the financial year 2019-20. The Customs Department believes that the declared value of the imported goods may not be accurate or compliant with the law, which could lead to underpayment of customs duties.
Hindustan Zinc Limited has stated that it is planning to challenge this order. The company is anticipated to file an appeal with the higher customs authority within the time allowed by law. The company believes the decision will likely be in its favour and does not expect this order to have any major financial impact.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2730My Recent Articles
- Merely Absence of PAN or Email Address in Sale Confirmation Cannot Prove Transaction Bogus, Holds ITATPremium
- Max Healthcare Faces NCLT Proceedings Over Kalinga Hospital; Next Hearing Scheduled for Sept 28
- Mere Assumptions Cannot Sustain Addition: Rs 15.72 Lakh Cash Addition Deleted After ITAT Finds No Incriminating EvidencePremium
- ITAT Allows Normal Tax Rate on Rs 75 Lakh Survey Surrender, Rejects 60% Section 115BBE LevyPremium
- HC Sets Aside Ex Parte Adjudication Order After SCN Merely Uploaded on GST Portal under 'Additional Notice and Orders' TabPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…








