ICAI Disciplinary Committee Holds Chartered Accountant Guilty of Professional Misconduct

CA Found Liable for Gross Negligence in Certifying Statutory Forms for Shell Companies

CAI Finds CA Guilty for Certifying E-Forms of Shell Companies

Meetu Kumari | Mar 1, 2026 |

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Holds Chartered Accountant Guilty of Professional Misconduct

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Holds Chartered Accountant Guilty of Professional Misconduct

The Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) conducted proceedings against CA Mohit Kumar (the Respondent) following a complaint by the Deputy Registrar of Companies (ROC), Delhi & Haryana. The ROC alleged that the Respondent had certified various statutory e-forms for several companies that were later found to be non-existent or “shell” entities.

These companies typically shared common registered addresses where no business activity was conducted. The investigation revealed that the Respondent failed to physically verify the registered offices or to perform due diligence on the identities of the directors and the authenticity of the documents before affixing his digital signature and certifying the forms as “true and correct.”

Issue Before Committee: Whether the Chartered Accountant failed to exercise “due diligence” and was “grossly negligent” in the conduct of his professional duties under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, by certifying statutory forms for companies without verifying their physical presence or the legitimacy of their operations.

Committee’s Decision: The Disciplinary Committee held the Respondent GUILTY of Professional Misconduct. The Committee found him liable under Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule (for gross negligence) and Clause (1) of Part II of the Second Schedule (for contravening provisions of the Act/Rules).

The Committee observed that a Chartered Accountant’s certification is a solemn act that stakeholders and regulators rely upon. By certifying that companies were functioning from specific addresses when they were not, and by failing to verify the credentials of the management, the Respondent facilitated the operations of suspicious entities. The Committee emphasized that “blind reliance” on documents provided by clients without independent verification constitutes professional misconduct.

To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio
My Recent Articles
ICAI Disciplinary Committee Holds Chartered Accountant Guilty of Professional Misconduct Architect & PMC Services for Fire Station Project Held Exempt as “Pure Services” Under GST ITAT Deletes Section 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits After Estimating Liquor Business Profits Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Pre-Deposit Dispute Under Customs Act High Court Rejects Transporter’s Plea Against GST Penalty Over Alleged Fake FirmsView All Posts