ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Incorrect TDS Reporting in Form 3CD:

Failure to exercise due diligence in certifying tax audit report where no TDS was reported on material professional payment
ICAI Reprimands CA for Incorrect TDS Reporting in Form 3CD

ICAI Disciplinary Committee Reprimands CA for Incorrect TDS Reporting in Form 3CD
A complaint was filed by CA Umesh Chandra against CA Amit Kumar Puniani regarding the audit of M/s Om Prakash Rathi & Co. for FY 2019-20. It was alleged that Rs. 11,50,000 was paid to Ms. Radha Gupta/Aggarwal, of which Rs. 10,50,000 was claimed as expenditure without deduction of TDS. The amount constituted over 70% of the firm’s total expenses and was inconsistently reflected as “Salary” in the Profit & Loss Account and as “Professional Charges” in the annexure.
The Respondent contended that the amount represented professional charges for outsourced services, that he relied on partners’ explanations, and that the classification difference was clerical. He argued that verification of genuineness was not required and that the recipient had offered the income to tax.
Issue Raised: Whether the Respondent failed to exercise due diligence while certifying Form 3CD by reporting non-applicability of TDS provisions on a materially significant payment of Rs. 10,50,000.
Committee's Order: The Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India held that the Respondent was guilty of professional misconduct. It observed that Rs. 10,50,000 formed a substantial portion of total expenditure and was classified as professional charges, yet Clause 34(a) of Form 3CD stated that TDS provisions were not applicable. The Committee also noted inconsistency in presentation and absence of supporting documentation such as invoices or agreements.
The Committee held that incorrect reporting of TDS applicability in a certified tax audit report amounts to lack of due diligence. Once a Chartered Accountant signs Form 3CD, professional responsibility attaches. Accordingly, under Section 21B(3)(a) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, the Respondent was found guilty under Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule and was ordered to be Reprimanded.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








