ICAI Reprimands CA for Certifying DIR-12 Without Valid DIN at Time of Appointment:

ICAI Reprimands CA for Certifying DIR-12 Without Valid DIN at Time of Appointment

Retrospective certification of director appointment without DIN held as failure to exercise due diligence

ICAI Reprimands CA for Certifying Director Appointment Without Valid DIN

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 23, 2026
Last update on Feb 23, 2026
ICAI Reprimands CA for Certifying DIR-12 Without Valid DIN at Time of Appointment A complaint by Mr. Ishwar Lal alleged that CA Priya Gupta certified Form DIR-12 appointing Shri Narender Jha as Director with effect, even though his DIN was allotted only on 14.10.2019. The appointment was stated to have been approved in the Board Meeting and regularised in the AGM. The Respondent contended that at the time of certification, the DIN had already been allotted and that she relied on documents provided by the company. She denied mala fide intent and attributed the lapse to oversight and internal disputes.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Main Issue: Whether certifying DIR-12 reflecting the retrospective appointment of a director who did not hold a valid DIN on the date of appointment amounts to failure to exercise due diligence under Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule to the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. DC's Ruling: The Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India held that possession of a valid DIN is a mandatory precondition for appointment as a director under the Companies Act, 2013. Though the DIN was available on the date of certification, the effective appointment date shown in DIR-12 was 16.09.2019, when no DIN existed. Certifying compliance in such circumstances reflected lack of due diligence.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
The Committee found the Respondent guilty of Professional Misconduct under Clause (7) of Part I of the Second Schedule and, under Section 21B(3)(a), ordered that she be Reprimanded. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…