ICAI Reprimands CA for Wrong FCCB Classification and Failure to Qualify Audit:

ICAI Reprimands CA for Wrong FCCB Classification and Failure to Qualify Audit

Reliance on legal opinion without independent evaluation and failure to qualify audit report held as professional misconduct

ICAI Reprimands CA for Wrong FCCB Classification and Failure to Qualify Audit

authorMeetu KumaridateFeb 23, 2026
Last update on Feb 23, 2026
ICAI Reprimands CA for Wrong FCCB Classification and Failure to Qualify Audit The Disciplinary Committee of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India examined information from the Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB) regarding the statutory audit of Prakash Industries Limited for FY 2015-16 conducted by CA Laxmi Narain Jain. The FRRB alleged multiple non-compliances with Accounting Standards, Standards on Auditing, CARO 2016 and Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013. The Director (Discipline) formed a prima facie opinion of guilt.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Issue Before Committee: Whether reporting matured FCCBs as non-current liabilities based on legal opinion, without issuing a qualified audit opinion under SA 705, amounted to failure to exercise due diligence and professional misconduct. Committee's Decision: The Committee held that the classification of matured FCCBs as non-current liabilities was inconsistent with Schedule III to the Companies Act, 2013, as the liability had fallen due for settlement. It observed that mere reliance on legal opinion and management representations, without sufficient independent audit evaluation, fell short of the professional skepticism required under auditing standards.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Further, instead of modifying the audit opinion as mandated under SA 705 in case of material misstatement, the Respondent included the matter only as an Emphasis of Matter under SA 706. The Committee clarified that an Emphasis of Matter cannot substitute a modified opinion where warranted. Thus, the Respondent was held guilty of professional misconduct and was ordered to be Reprimanded. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…