ITAT: Addition made solely on the basis of one dummy director not sustainable

  • Home
  • ITAT: Addition made solely on the basis of one dummy director not sustainable

CA Bimal Jain | Oct 13, 2021 | Views 31370

ITAT: Addition made solely on the basis of one dummy director not sustainable

ITAT: Addition made solely on the basis of one dummy director not sustainable

In M/S. Frost Falcon Distilleries v. DCIT, Haryana [ITA No.7713/Del/2018 & ITA No.7946/Del/2018 (Cross Appeals) Assessment Year: 2008-09 dated October 07, 2021], M/S. Frost Falcon Distilleries (“Appellant”) filed an appeal against Order dated September 04, 2018 (“Impugned order”) passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (“CIT(A)”) for the Assessment Year (“AY”) 2008-2009.

In this case, the Assessing Officer (“AO”), after a search operation, framed an Assessment under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the IT Act”) and subsequently an addition of was made on account of unaccounted money introduced into the Appellant company by four parties in the form of share capital. The AO held that the aforesaid Companies were non-existent through which the Appellant introduced his own unaccounted money.

During the survey action, the department recorded a statement from the Director wherein he stated that he was only dummy director of the Appellant company and his company; M/s Aachman Vanijya (P) Ltd. (the Company concerning the Dummy Director which was an investor company to the Appellant) was a paper company and no genuine business activities were carried out by the said company.

The Appellant challenged the Impugned order of the AO wherein the first appellate authority accepted their plea and granted relief.

After taking perusal of all the facts and evidences of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Authority (“ITAT”), New Delhi held that the addition can be made in case of completed assessment only on the basis of incriminating material found during the search action, and therefore, in the Tribunal’s view, the action of the CIT(A) in confirming the addition of on the basis of sole statement of one dummy director, recorded during the survey action in case of the Appellant company, without confronting the same to the Appellant, wasn’t held to be justified.

The impugned addition was, therefore, ordered to be deleted. In view of the above discussion, the appeal of the Appellant was allowed.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

To Read the Full Judgment Download PDF Given Below :

Join Studycafe's What's App Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio

My Recent Articles

Guidelines on grant of bail to accused not arrested during investigation post filing of Chargesheet Irrecoverable loss incurred due to bad weather and technical snags would be considered as Revenue Loss SEZ falls within the meaning of ‘any person’ as given under Section 54 of the CGST Act and shall be entitled to refund Best Judgment Assessment Order withdrawn as Petitioner filed relevant returns in accordance with order of High Court Quashed registration cancellation order of GSTN and directed Department to consider the case afresh View All Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *