ITAT Allows Full Section 54 Exemption Despite Non-Deposit in Capital Gain Account Scheme:

Procedural lapse cannot override substantive compliance where entire capital gain is invested in new residential house within statutory period
ITAT: Section 54 Deduction Cannot Be Denied for Non-Deposit in CGAS

ITAT Allows Full Section 54 Exemption Despite Non-Deposit in Capital Gain Account Scheme
The assessee, an individual, filed his return for AY 2018-19, declaring an income of Rs. 1.03 crore. During the year, he and his spouse sold a jointly owned residential house on 14.12.2017 for Rs. 3.70 crore, resulting in long-term capital gains of Rs. 1.33 crore. The assessee’s 50% share of capital gain amounted to Rs. 66.91 lakh, for which deduction under Section 54 was claimed.
The assessee entered into an agreement on 02.03.2018 to purchase a new residential house for Rs. 4.44 crore and paid Rs. 44.40 lakh up to the due date under Section 139(1). The balance consideration was paid later on through a housing loan and own funds. The sale deed was executed on 24.10.2019, within two years from the date of transfer.
The Assessing Officer restricted the Section 54 deduction to Rs. 44.40 lakh on the ground that the unutilized capital gain was not deposited in the Capital Gain Account Scheme as required under Section 54(2). The disallowance was upheld by the CIT(A).
Issue to be Decided: Whether Section 54 exemption can be denied merely for non-deposit of unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gain Account Scheme when the entire capital gain is invested within the prescribed period.
Tribunal's Decision: The ITAT allowed the appeal and deleted the disallowance of Rs. 22.51 lakh. It held that Section 54(2) is procedural and applies only where the assessee fails to satisfy the substantive condition under Section 54(1). Since the assessee had invested an amount exceeding the capital gains in a new residential house within two years, the exemption could not be denied.
Relying on Venkata Dilip Kumar v. CIT (Madras High Court), the Tribunal held that non-deposit in the Capital Gain Account Scheme is a technical lapse and does not defeat the substantive benefit. The assessee was therefore held to be entitled to a full deduction of Rs. 66.91 lakh under Section 54.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2166My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condones 648-Day Delay After Assessee Lost Family During COVID, Restores AppealPremium
- ITAT Quashes Rs 2 Crore Penalty as Time-Barred; Limitation Starts from AO’s Reference, Not Show-Cause NoticePremium
- ITAT Remands Appeal After Finding NFAC Ignored 89 Pages of Evidence on Cash Deposits and Flat Improvement CostPremium
- ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity in Rs 2.63 Crore Foreign Bank Credit Addition CasePremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 68 Addition on Explained Demonetisation Cash DepositsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








