ITAT Bangalore Condoned 375-Day Delay And Restores Appeal on Rs 91.41 Lakh Addition Relating to Agricultural Income:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore has condoned a delay of 375 days in filing an appeal after taking note of the assessee's medical condition.
ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Decide Matter Afresh After Providing Opportunity of Hearing

ITAT Bangalore Condoned 375-Day Delay And Restored Appeal on Rs 91.41 Lakh Addition Relating to Agricultural Income
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore held that medical complications arising from a renal transplant and kidney-related problems constituted sufficient cause for condoning the delay of 375 days.
The assessee had filed its return of income for assessment year 2017-18 declaring nil income. Subsequently, the case was selected for limited scrutiny under the Computer Assisted Scrutiny Selection (CASS) to examine the large agricultural income disclosed by the assessee. During the assessment proceedings, notices under Sections 143(2) and 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were issued. In response, the assessee furnished details regarding various agricultural lands and stated that income had been derived from mango, coconut, sapota and eucalyptus trees. Assessee also produced details of sales of capsicum amounting to Rs 62.47 lakh.
However, the AO observed that the income claims of the assessee are not corroborated by evidence and consequently treated Rs 91.41 lakh as unexplained income. Aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) and since no response was furnished despite four opportunities granted, the appeal was dismissed.
Thereafter, the assessee approached the Tribunal with a delay of 375 days and pleaded that the delay had occurred due to medical complications relating to a renal transplant and kidney-related ailments. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had shown sufficient cause for the late filing of the appeal.
Accordingly, the appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. Accepting the explanation furnished by the assessee, the Bench condoned the delay of 375 days. The Tribunal further held that, in the interest of justice, the matter ought to be restored to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
About Author

Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
220My Recent Articles
- ITAT Holds Reimbursement of Common Expenses Without Profit Not Liable for TDSPremium
- ITAT Rules That Reassessment Proceedings Invalid Without Mandatory Notice under Section 143(2)Premium
- ITAT Rules that Section 153C Cannot Be Invoked Where the Date of Search for 'Other Person' Falls After 1 April 2021Premium
- ITAT Rules Reassessment Notices Where Escaped Income Ultimately Fell Below Rs 50 Lakh Threshold as UnsustainablePremium
- CBIC Constitutes Working Group to Examine Centralised Administration of Taxpayers with Multiple GST Registrations
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








