RBI Levies penalty of Rs. 70,000 on Repco Home Finance Over 'Fair Practice Code' Non-Compliance:

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has imposed a penalty of Rs 70,000 on Repco Home Finance Limited over Non-compliance with 'Fair Practice Code' directions.
Non-Adherence With RBI's Directions on 'Fair Practice Code' Costs Company

RBI Levies penalty of Rs. 70,000 on Repco Home Finance Over 'Fair Practice Code' Non-Compliance
Repco Home Finance Limited has informed the stock exchanges (NSE and BSE) that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued a Speaking Order levying a penalty amounting to Rs 70,000.
The order was issued to the company on June 12, 2026. The said penalty has been imposed on the company for non-compliance with the directions issued by the Reserve Bank of India on the 'Fair Practice Code'.
The company has clarified that the impact of the present action on its financial, operational, or other activities is limited to the penalty amount levied, i.e., Rs 70,000. The company has since undertaken corrective action to address the issue.
Repco Home Finance Limited has disclosed the aforementioned information via an Intimation No. RHFL/SE/20/2026-27, dated June 12, 2026, under Regulations 30 and 51 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2484My Recent Articles
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
- Cash Deposited During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A if Linked to Business, Holds ITAT Premium
- ITAT Condones 1,731-Day Delay, Remands Cancer Trust's Section 12A Registration Application for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
- ITAT Lowers Estimated Profit Rate from 8% to 4% After Considering State Shutdown and Medicine Trade MarginsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








