ITAT Deletes Rs. 1.82 Crore Addition on Cash Held for Payments to Farmers During Demonetisation:

ITAT Deletes Rs. 1.82 Crore Addition on Cash Held for Payments to Farmers During Demonetisation

The Ahmedabad ITAT deleted the Rs 1.82 crore addition made on cash deposits during demonetisation after finding that the assessee had sufficient disclosed cash balance and proper supporting records to explain the deposits

The Tribunal held that the assessee had sufficient cash balance available to explain the deposits made during the demonetisation period.

authorAishwarya SinghdateMay 14, 2026
Last update on May 14, 2026
ITAT Deletes Rs. 1.82 Crore Addition on Cash Held for Payments to Farmers During Demonetisation The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Ahmedabad dismissed the appeal and upheld the deletion of an addition of Rs 1.82 crore against Shailendrasinh Bharatbhai Barad. Basically, the department wanted to add Rs 1.82 crore to his income, claiming he didn’t explain the cash he deposited during demonetisation. But the Tribunal didn’t buy it; they said he gave a clear explanation and the Assessing Officer jumped to conclusions by calling it “unexplained money” under Section 69A.
Additional ITC Benefit Must Reach Homebuyers, Holds GST Appellate Tribunal
The respondent is a registered commission agent at the Sanand APMC. Buy produce from farmers and sell it to traders and mill owners. When the tax office took a closer look at his 2017-18 financials, they saw these hefty cash deposits Rs 1,82,01,000 to be exact made during demonetisation. That made them suspicious. The officer said Barad didn’t give full details, so he labelled the whole amount as unexplained.
ITAT Restores Coffee Income Computation Matter for Fresh Examination
Respondent pushed back. He said he always kept plenty of cash on hand for paying farmers, something his books and bank statements could back up. The cash he deposited during demonetisation, he argued, wasn’t new or shady; it was already shown in earlier tax returns. Plus, the records showed he’d withdrawn a lot of cash for business from March to November 2016.
ROC Chennai Penalises Nidhi Company for Delay in Filing MGT-14 for approval of accounts
The Tribunal looked at the evidence and found that Barad (Respondent) did have enough cash on hand during that period. The tax department couldn’t poke holes in the Commissioner’s findings either. In the end, the Tribunal stuck with deleting the addition and tossed out the Revenue’s appeal.

About Author

LinkedIn

Aishwarya Singh

Legal Content Writer

StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
92
Up Next

Loading suggestions…