ITAT Grants Relief to NDTV; Deletes Multiple Disallowances and Remands Corporate Guarantee Issue:

ITAT Grants Relief to NDTV; Deletes Multiple Disallowances and Remands Corporate Guarantee Issue

Tribunal Dismisses Revenue's Appeal on Section 14A, Transmission Charges, and Software Expenses; Directs Fresh Look at Corporate Guarantee Adjustments

ITAT: Relief for NDTV in Corporate Guarantee and Section 14A Dispute

authorMeetu KumaridateMar 9, 2026
Last update on Mar 9, 2026
ITAT Grants Relief to NDTV; Deletes Multiple Disallowances and Remands Corporate Guarantee Issue The assessee, New Delhi Television Ltd. (NDTV), engaged in news broadcasting, filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2010-11 declaring a loss. The case was scrutinized, and the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) proposed an upward adjustment of Rs. 3.29 crore for international transactions. The Assessing Officer (AO) passed a draft assessment order proposing further disallowances under Section 14A, Section 40(a)(ia) for transmission charges, and software expenses. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) deleted some of these disallowances but upheld others. Both the Revenue and the assessee filed cross-appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) challenging the DRP's directions.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Main Issue: Whether the DRP was justified in deleting disallowances under Sections 14A and 40(a)(ia), treating software expenses as revenue, excluding certain comparables, and whether a corporate guarantee constituted an international transaction under Section 92B. ITAT Held: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and partly allowed the assessee’s appeal. It upheld deletion of the Rs. 1.34 crore disallowance under Section 14A as no exempt income was earned, relying on Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT. The Tribunal also confirmed deletion of the Rs. 3.44 crore disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia), holding that payments to Intelsat Corporation did not require TDS.
Sales Tax Bar Urges FM to Reduce High GSTAT Appeal Fees; Highlights Burden on MSMEs and Small Traders
Further, it held that software expenses were revenue in nature due to their short useful life and frequent upgrades and directed exclusion of APITCO Ltd. and TSR Darashaw Ltd. from the set of comparables as they were functionally dissimilar to the assessee’s support services. However, the issue of the Rs. 2.90 crore corporate guarantee adjustment was remanded to the Assessing Officer to first determine whether it constituted an international transaction under Section 92B before making any transfer pricing adjustment, in line with directions of the Delhi High Court in the assessee’s earlier case. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…