ITAT Holds A Taxpayer Must Be Granted Minimum 7-Day Time Limit to Respond A Section 148(b) Notice:

The ITAT says to initiate reassessment proceedings, a taxpayer must be granted a minimum of 7 days' time limit to respond to a Section 148(b) notice.
ITAT Quashes Reassessment Order

ITAT Holds A Taxpayer Must Be Granted Minimum 7-Day Time Limit to Respond A Section 148(b) Notice
The ITAT Bangalore invalidated the entire reassessment proceedings, holding that a taxpayer must be granted a minimum of 7 and a maximum of 30 days' time limit to respond to a notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act. However, the assessee was granted only 5 days of time to respond to the notice.
The dispute arose when the tax authorities reopened the case of Subbaro Anandarao (assessee) by issuing a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee submitted that he was granted the prescribed time limit to respond to the notice. However, as per the provisions of the said section, a taxpayer is generally granted a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 30 days to reply to the notice. However, in the present case, it was only granted a time limit of 5 days to respond to the notice.
Accordingly, the assessee claimed that the Section 148A(b) notice issued in his case to reopen assessment was invalid; consequently, it is liable to be set aside. In support of his case, the assessee also relied on an earlier ruling decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in Bangalore, Thulaseedas Srinath vs IT Officer and Doddagarudanahalli Vyavasaya Seva Bank Niyamitha vs Income Tax Officer.
When the tribunal examined the facts of the case, it noted that the assessee was indeed granted only 5 days to respond to the Section 148(b) notice. The tribunal held that in cases where a taxpayer is not granted a minimum time limit of 7 days to respond to a notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act, the entire reassessment becomes invalid. Consequently, the tribunal invalidated the entire reassessment proceedings and set aside the impugned Section 148(b) notice.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2677My Recent Articles
- CBI Court Convicts and Sentences EPFO Officer to Rigorous Imprisonment for Four Years in Rs 10 Lakh Bribery Case
- ITAT Grants Rs 15.64 Lakh Tax Deduction to Cooperative Society Under Section 80P(2)(a)(i)Premium
- CBI Court Chennai Convicts and Sentences One Private Company and Six Other Individuals in Rs 2.68 Crore Bank Fraud Case
- Diligent Media Corporation Faces Rs 1.12 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Claimed From Ab Initio Cancelled Vendor
- ITAT Remands Case of Section 69A Unexplained Cash Deposits During Demonetisation Period After CIT(A) Passes Ex Parte OrderPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts









