ITAT Holds Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Stating Misreporting Default:
ITAT set aside the Rs 80,050 penalty under Section 270A after finding that the AO failed to specify the particular misreporting default under Section 270A(9).
ITAT Deletes Rs 80,050 Penalty Under Section 270A
Saloni Kumari
Sep 15, 2026
Premium
ITAT Holds Section 270A Penalty Invalid Without Stating Misreporting Default
ITAT set aside the Rs 80,050 penalty under Section 270A after finding that the AO failed to specify the particular misreporting default under Section 270A(9).
Also Read
ITAT Remands Tax Matter to AO After Finding Natural Justice Violation and CIT(A)'s Failure to Examine Appeal on Merits 5paisa Capital Wins Major Relief in Income Tax Appeal, Disallowance Cut to Rs 2.87 CroreITAT Remands Case for Fresh Decision After Granting Hearing OpportunityITAT Remands Addition for Fresh Assessment After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Orders
About Author
Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2991My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Tax Matter to AO After Finding Natural Justice Violation and CIT(A)'s Failure to Examine Appeal on Merits
- Max Healthcare Subsidiary Kalinga Hospital Faces NCLT Proceedings; Hearing Adjourned to October 30
- Supreme Court: Income Tax Reassessment Invalid Without Mandatory Section 143(2) Notice Issuance Even If Taxpayer Participates
- CBI Registers Case Against Chandra Proteco and Its Bank Fraud of Over Rs 210.13 Crore
- CBDT Restricts Applicability of Chapter XIX Income Tax Provisions on Payments to IRRI Subject to Certain Conditions
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts