ITAT Quashes Section 271D Penalty as Barred by Limitation:
The ITAT Chennai quashed penalty order passed beyond 6 Month Limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
ITAT Deleted Rs 3 Lakh Penalty
Saima
Sep 16, 2026
Premium
ITAT Quashes Section 271D Penalty as Barred by Limitation
The ITAT Chennai quashed penalty order passed beyond 6 Month Limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
Also Read
From September 30 to October 31? Tax Bar Seeks More Time for Tax Audit ReportsITAT Allows Foreign Tax Credit Despite Belated Form 67 FilingReassessment Notice by JAO or FAO? ITAT Remands Case to CIT(A) Amid Retrospective Validation of Section 148 NoticesITAT Remands Section 201(1A) Interest Dispute for Fresh Verification Over Duplication/Overlap Claim
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
430My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Foreign Tax Credit Despite Belated Form 67 FilingPremium
- ITAT Holds Safe Harbour Rules Cannot Be Applied Mechanically to Earlier Assessment YearPremium
- ITAT Deletes Section 50C Addition After Reopening-Based Addition Was DeletedPremium
- GSTAT Holds GST Refund Cannot Depend on Manufacturer StatusPremium
- ITAT Remands Petrol Pump Income Case for Fresh Examination Over Unjustified 8% Profit EstimationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts