ITAT Quashes Section 271D Penalty as Barred by Limitation:

The ITAT Chennai quashed penalty order passed beyond 6 Month Limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
ITAT Deleted Rs 3 Lakh Penalty

Premium
ITAT Quashes Section 271D Penalty as Barred by Limitation
The ITAT Chennai quashed penalty order passed beyond 6 Month Limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
Also Read
ITAT Remands Tax Matter to AO After Finding Natural Justice Violation and CIT(A)'s Failure to Examine Appeal on Merits 5paisa Capital Wins Major Relief in Income Tax Appeal, Disallowance Cut to Rs 2.87 CroreITAT Remands Case for Fresh Decision After Granting Hearing OpportunityITAT Remands Addition for Fresh Assessment After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Orders
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
596My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Case for Fresh Decision After Granting Hearing Opportunity
- ITAT Remands Addition for Fresh Assessment After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Orders
- ITAT Holds Repaid Loan Cannot Be Treated as Bogus Accommodation Entry Merely on Suspicion
- ITAT Holds Audit Objection Cannot Alone Justify Reassessment Revision
- ITAT Holds Mere Disallowance of Employees’ PF/ESI Contribution Insufficient
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








