ITAT Quashes Section 271D Penalty as Barred by Limitation:
The ITAT Chennai quashed penalty order passed beyond 6 Month Limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
ITAT Deleted Rs 3 Lakh Penalty
Saima
Sep 16, 2026
Premium
ITAT Quashes Section 271D Penalty as Barred by Limitation
The ITAT Chennai quashed penalty order passed beyond 6 Month Limitation period under Section 275(1)(c).
Also Read
ITAT Remands Rs 23.53 Lakh Business Income Case to AO for Fresh Adjudication After Assessee Fails to Respond to NoticesITAT Deletes Section 271AAA Penalty on Diamond Stock Discrepancy for Failure to Establish Undisclosed IncomeITAT Takes Liberal View on 783-Day Delay, Allows Appeal Against Rs 1.87 Lakh Penalty to Be Heard on MeritsITAT Condones 24-Day Delay, Remands Rs 1.07 Crore LTCG Penny Stock Dispute After CIT(A) Fails to Record Complete Submissions
About Author
Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
514My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Section 271AAA Penalty on Diamond Stock Discrepancy for Failure to Establish Undisclosed Income
- GST Refund Cannot Be Treated as Taxable Income Merely on Tax Audit Disclosure
- High Court Upholds Post-Death GST Proceedings Under Section 93
- High Court Holds Parallel GST Proceedings Barred Only When They Concern the Same Subject Matter Under Section 6(2)(b)
- ITAT Holds Customer Referral Commission Not Taxable as FTS Under India-Netherlands DTAA
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts