ITAT Remits Rs. 93.34 Lakh Processing Fee Disallowance for Fresh Adjudication:

ITAT Remits Rs. 93.34 Lakh Processing Fee Disallowance for Fresh Adjudication

The ITAT Ahmedabad rules Harsha Engineers’ processing fee claim requires examination of borrowing purpose and capital asset nexus.

ITAT Partly Allowed Appeal

authorSaimadateOct 5, 2026
Last update on Oct 5, 2026

M/s. Harsha Engineers International Limited is merged from M/s. Harsha Abacus Solar Pvt. Ltd. and has challenged the order of the CIT(A) passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2018-19. The assessee raised three grounds, including violation of Section 144B, disallowance of Rs. 93,34,795/- towards upfront and processing fees under Section 37, and non-grant of TDS credit of Rs. 2,08,15,442.60/- under Section 199 of the Act.

Five Tamil Nadu Police Personnel Face Disciplinary Action Within a Week Over Allegations of Demanding and Accepting Bribes

The AO had treated the upfront and processing fees as capital expenditure and disallowed the amount of Rs. 93,34,795/-. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance. The Tribunal observed that the issue required examination of the period to which the expenditure related and the actual purpose of the corresponding borrowings. It held that the mere fact that the payment was made to a bank, or that the expenditure was treated as prepaid, would not by itself establish that the expenditure was capital in nature.

ZF Commercial Vehicle Control Systems India Wins GST Appeal as Rs 1.79 Crore ITC Demand and Penalty Set Aside

The Tribunal accordingly set aside the CIT(A)’s finding and restored the matter to the AO for fresh adjudication. With regard to the assessee’s claim for TDS credit of Rs. 2,08,15,442.60/-, the Tribunal noted that although the CIT(A) recorded that no submission had been made by the assessee on the issue, the CIT(A) had already directed the AO to grant credit of the TDS deducted while computing the demand payable in accordance with law.

ITAT Condones 111-Day Delay, Restores Co-operative Society’s Appeal in Rs 91.96 Lakh Cash Deposit Dispute

Since the appropriate direction had already been issued, the Tribunal declined to interfere with the CIT(A)’s order on this issue.

About Author

LinkedIn

Saima

Content Writer

Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
500
Up Next

Loading suggestions…