ITAT Restores Trust’s Registration Applications under Sections 12A and 80G, Rejected Without Hearing:

ITAT Restores Trust’s Registration Applications under Sections 12A and 80G, Rejected Without Hearing

ITAT sets aside rejection of trust’s applications under Sections 12A and 80G where no hearing was given; matter remanded to CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication.

Applications under Sections 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and 80G(5)(iii) remanded back as rejection without hearing held unjustified.

authorMeetu KumaridateSep 1, 2025
Last update on Sep 1, 2025
ITAT Restores Trust’s Registration Applications under Sections 12A and 80G, Rejected Without Hearing The assessee, being a charitable trust involving activities of education and social welfare among poor and backward sections of society, submitted Form 10AB for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and permanent registration under Section 12AB, and for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income-tax Act. On receipt of the notices, the assessee filed replies and supporting documents. Ignoring the reply and supporting documents filed, the Commissioner (Exemption) discarded the applications by order dated 14.02.2025 without extending any opportunity of hearing. The subsequent application was also rejected. Aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeals before the Tribunal, contending that its replies and annexures were not considered. The Department supported the order of the Commissioner (Exemption).
ITAT Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn After Rectification Relief Granted u/s 115BAA
Issue Before ITAT Whether rejection of registration applications under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and Section 80G(5)(iii) without affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing was valid in law.
ITAT Quashes Reassessment Notices as Time-Barred under Section 148
ITAT's Decision: The Tribunal noted that the assessee had put on record a number of documents to prove the genuineness of its operations. It found that the rejection was unjustified as no sufficient opportunity of hearing was given. Thus, the issues were restored to the file of the Commissioner (Exemption) with a direction to examine the documents afresh and decide the applications in accordance with law after providing reasonable opportunity. Both appeals (ITA Nos. 4774 & 4775/DEL/2025) were allowed for statistical purposes. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below

About Author

Meetu Kumari

Content Manager

Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2157
Up Next

Loading suggestions…