ITAT Sets Aside Rejection of 12AB and 80G Registration Passed Without Hearing Assessee:

The ITAT Delhi has held that an application for registration under Sections 12AB and 80G of the Income-tax Act cannot be rejected without granting the applicant an effective opportunity of being heard.
ITAT remands matter to CIT (Exemptions)

ITAT Sets Aside Rejection of 12AB and 80G Registration Passed Without Hearing Assessee
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi held that the application for registration under Sections 12AB and 80G of the Income-tax Act is liable to be set aside if a reasonable opportunity of being heard had not been given to the applicant.
[related id="425182 "]
The assessee is a charitable trust that has filed appeals before the ITAT challenging the orders of the CIT (Exemptions), Delhi, rejecting its applications for registration under Sections 12AB and 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal first condoned the delay in filing the appeals after considering the assessee's application for condonation.
[related id="425245 "]
It was submitted that the applications had been rejected without giving the trust any opportunity of being heard.
The Tribunal observed that the CIT(E) had rejected the application under Section 12AB without providing the assessee an opportunity to present its case and held that such action was in violation of the principles of natural justice and the Tribunal found it appropriate to restore the matter for fresh consideration.
[related id="425109 "]
Accordingly, the Tribunal directed the CIT (Exemptions) to provide the assessee with a proper opportunity of hearing and thereafter decide the applications on merits in accordance with the law. The assessee was also directed to cooperate with the proceedings and make appropriate submissions. Both appeals were accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
About Author

Saima
Content Writer
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
Saima is a Law graduate with a passion for research and content writing. She writes for Finance, Taxation and Legal Updates at Studycafe.in, simplifying complex legal decisions by the ITAT, High Court, AAR and GSTAT into uncomplicated and clear explanations.
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
175My Recent Articles
- High Court Quashes Section 179 Proceedings Against Directors for Lack of Reasonable Opportunity Premium
- High Court Rules Reassessment Notice under Section 148 Cannot Be Issued on Mere Change of OpinionPremium
- High Court rules CGST Adjudication Challenges Involving Sections 74(9), 75(4), 70 and 122 Do Not Automatically Warrant Article 226 InterferencePremium
- High Court Restores GST Registration of Tempo Operator Cancelled for Six Month Return DefaultPremium
- High Court Directs GST Authority to Decide Continuation of Registration Suspension After Fresh SCNPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








