ITC cannot be reversed solely on the basis of auto-populated Credit Note in Form GSTR-2A [Read Order]:

ITC cannot be reversed solely on the basis of auto-populated Credit Note in Form GSTR-2A [Read Order] The petitioner challenges an assessment order dated 11.08.2023 and the consequential bank attachment order dated 18.11.2023. The petitioner asserts that he was regular in filing returns. He further asserts that he was unaware of the issuance of the notice in Form ASMT-10, the show cause notice in Form DRC-01 and the assessment order dated  11.08.2023  until he received the impugned bank attachment order dated 18.11.2023. The present writ petition was filed in the said facts and circumstances. The Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed of by the petitioner was reversed on the ground that three suppliers had issued credit notes to the petitioner. Out of the three, he submits that the petitioner did not purchase any products from MahamayaIspat, A Division of Abhishek Steel Industries Limited and that, therefore, the said entity did not issue credit notes during the relevant period. If the petitioner had knowledge of the proceedings initiated by the respondents, it is stated that the petitioner would have placed these facts on record. Learned counsel further submits that the aggregate sum of Rs.3,39,674 was appropriated pursuant to the bank attachment Order. Contention of GST Department: It was submitted that the reversal of ITC was on the basis of the auto-populated GSTR-2A. He submits that this information was taken from the portal. Order of the Court: 4. The admitted position is that the entire demand under the assessment order of Rs.2,82,760/- was satisfied by way of the remittance made by the bank to the tax department. Consequently, revenue interest is fully protected at this juncture. If the contention of the petitioner that no supplies were effected by Abhishek Steel Industries Limited is found to be correct, the reversal of ITC to that extent may warrant revision. Solely, for this reason, the impugned order calls for interference. 5. Therefore, the impugned assessment order dated 11.08.2023 is quashed and the matter is remanded for re-consideration by the first respondent. The petitioner is permitted to submit a reply to the show cause notice dated 11.07.2023 within a maximum period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt thereof, the first respondent is directed to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh assessment order within a maximum period of two months thereafter. For the avoidance of doubt, it is made clear that the amounts appropriated pursuant to the assessment order shall be retained subject to the outcome of the remanded proceedings. For Official Judgment Download PDF Given Below: