Limits of Section 263: Can PCIT Intervene on Matters Sub Judice Before CIT(A)?:

Limits of Section 263: Can PCIT Intervene on Matters Sub Judice Before CIT(A)? The assessee company was assessed under Section 153A, read with Section 143(3) for AYs 2013-14 to 2019-20, following a search. The Assessing Officer treated unsecured loans received by the assessee as unexplained cash credits under Section 68, branding them as accommodation entries. As a corollary, interest paid on these loans was also disallowed as bogus. The assessee challenged these additions before the CIT(A), who deleted them after holding that the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the lenders were adequately established. While this appeal was pending, the PCIT invoked revisionary powers under Section 263, directing the AO to disallow interest expenses on the same loans. The PCIT contended that the AO's failure to disallow interest made the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interest.

Also Read

GST Notice Uploaded on View Additional Notices and Orders Section; HC Quashes Order Without Proper Service

Main Issues: Whether the PCIT was justified in invoking Section 263 when the issue of unsecured loans and related interest was already under appeal before the CIT(A), and whether such matters should have been dealt with under the CIT(A) 's enhancement powers instead.

Also Read

Income Tax: HC Quashes Assessment as Notice Sent to Son's Email Without Mother's Consent

ITAT's Decision: The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeals for all years, holding that once the core issue of unsecured loans was pending before the CIT(A), the connected issue of interest disallowance also fell within the appellate domain. Therefore, the PCIT could not invoke Section 263 to revise a problem that the CIT(A) could have addressed under Section 251 through enhancement, if necessary. Relying on Smt. Renuka Philip v. ITO, the Tribunal reiterated that once an issue is under appeal, revisional jurisdiction under Section 263 cannot be exercised on the same subject. It also noted that fresh topics, such as interest under Section 234A, were raised without issuing a show-cause notice to the assessee, thereby breaching natural justice. Consequently, the revisionary orders under Section 263 were quashed for all assessment years. To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below