Madras HC Flags About Rs 100 Crore Discrepancy in Vijay Thalapathy’s Election Filings Ahead of Tamil Nadu Polls:

The Madras HC flagged a Rs 105 crore discrepancy in Vijay Thalapathy’s election affidavits, directing tax authorities to examine the issue ahead of the Tamil Nadu polls.
Major Income Mismatch in Vijay’s Nomination Filings

Madras HC Flags About Rs 100 Crore Discrepancy in Vijay Thalapathy’s Election Filings Ahead of Tamil Nadu Polls
The Madras High Court, in a ruling concerning the famous actor, Vijay Thalapathy, has held that discrepancies of more than Rs 100 crore have been noticed in his election affidavit. The income tax authorities have been directed to rely on this issue.
This recent order of the Madras High Court acts as a setback for both Vijay and his new political party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). The party is about to contest its first election in Tamil Nadu, which is currently governed by Chief Minister M. K. Stalin from the DMK.
For Tamil Nadu elections, Vijay has filed nomination papers from two seats, i.e., Tiruchirappalli (Trichy) and Perambur. A voter from Perambur had approached the court alleging a discrepancy in Vijay's income demonstrated in the two affidavits.
In Vijay's affidavit for Trichy, a total of Rs 220 crore was shown, while in that of Perambur's affidavit, he showed his total income at Rs 115 crore, which explicitly created an income difference of Rs 105 crore.
Vijay is entering politics and will face a tough three-way contest.
- In Tiruchirappalli East, he is fighting against DMK’s Inigo S. Irudayaraj.
- In Perambur, he is fighting against DMK MLA R. D. Sekar.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2641My Recent Articles
- ITAT Remands Dispute of Addition Solely Based on Third-Party Statement and Without Establishing Any Nexus for Fresh AdjudicationPremium
- GST Authorities Propose Rs 15.41 Crore Demand Against Nuvoco Vistas’ Subsidiary Over ITC, Credit Notes
- Tata Steel Limited Secures Relief Rs 1,755.10 Crore GST Demand Raised Over Alleged Excess Coal Extraction
- Indian Railway Finance Corporation Faces Rs 549 Crore GST Demand Over Alleged Excess ITC Availment for FY 2022-23
- Section 23(5) Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Unsold Flats: ITAT Deletes Rs 31.56 Lakh Deemed Rent AdditionPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts
All Posts
Recent Posts
All Posts








