Madras HC Flags About Rs 100 Crore Discrepancy in Vijay Thalapathy’s Election Filings Ahead of Tamil Nadu Polls:

The Madras HC flagged a Rs 105 crore discrepancy in Vijay Thalapathy’s election affidavits, directing tax authorities to examine the issue ahead of the Tamil Nadu polls.
Major Income Mismatch in Vijay’s Nomination Filings

Madras HC Flags About Rs 100 Crore Discrepancy in Vijay Thalapathy’s Election Filings Ahead of Tamil Nadu Polls
The Madras High Court, in a ruling concerning the famous actor, Vijay Thalapathy, has held that discrepancies of more than Rs 100 crore have been noticed in his election affidavit. The income tax authorities have been directed to rely on this issue.
This recent order of the Madras High Court acts as a setback for both Vijay and his new political party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK). The party is about to contest its first election in Tamil Nadu, which is currently governed by Chief Minister M. K. Stalin from the DMK.
For Tamil Nadu elections, Vijay has filed nomination papers from two seats, i.e., Tiruchirappalli (Trichy) and Perambur. A voter from Perambur had approached the court alleging a discrepancy in Vijay's income demonstrated in the two affidavits.
In Vijay's affidavit for Trichy, a total of Rs 220 crore was shown, while in that of Perambur's affidavit, he showed his total income at Rs 115 crore, which explicitly created an income difference of Rs 105 crore.
Vijay is entering politics and will face a tough three-way contest.
- In Tiruchirappalli East, he is fighting against DMK’s Inigo S. Irudayaraj.
- In Perambur, he is fighting against DMK MLA R. D. Sekar.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2420My Recent Articles
- Bona Fide Mistake in ITR Cannot Deny Section 10(10B) Exemption on BSNL VRS Compensation, Holds ITATPremium
- ITAT Grants Taxpayer a Final Opportunity to Explain Rs 2.27 Crore Cash Deposits Under Section 69APremium
- ITAT Restores Appeals for Fresh Consideration After NFAC Denied Request of Personal Hearing Through Video ConferencingPremium
- ITAT Condones 97-Day Delay, Restores Appeal After CIT(A) Sent Hearing Notices to Wrong Email AddressPremium
- MCA Appoints Justice (Retd.) Yogesh Khanna as Officiating Chairperson of NCLAT for Three Months
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








