MCA brings clarity on guidelines for reserving the name of the Company

MCA brings clarity on guidelines for reserving the name of the Company Ministry of Corporate Affairs has revised Rule 8 of the Companies (In

MCA brings clarity on guidelines for reserving the name of the Company
Ministry of Corporate Affairs has revised Rule 8 of the Companies (Incorporation) Rules, 2014 on 10th May 2019. Stakeholders are kindly advised to refer the revised name rules before making any application for company name reservation in RUN or SPICe.
While considering the application related to name approval the following illustrations must be considered otherwise the names shall be considered as undesirable and will not be approved. Some of the illustrations have been discussed hereunder:
1. Name should not be identical to singular or plural form of existing company;
User of plural or singular form of the words will be considered as undesirable and such name wouldn't be approved by authority on receipt of application for reservation of name of company. This can be better understood with the help of illustration as provided by MCA:
For e.g. (i) Green Technology Limited shall be considered same as Greens Technology Limited and Greens Technologies Limited.
(ii) Pratap Technology Ltd. is same as Prataps Technology Ltd. and Prataps Technologies Ltd.
(iii) SM Computers Ltd. is not same as SMS Computers Ltd.
2. Change in Tense would be considered as Similar Name;
The department will reject the application for reservation of name of the company if someone use different tense in name of the company such as:
For Eg. (i) Ascend Solution ltd. is same as Ascended Solutions Ltd and Ascending Solutions Ltd.
(ii) Speak English Solutions Limited is same as Spoken English Solutions Limited.
3. Different use of phonetic spellings is treated as identical name;
For Eg. (i) Chemtech Ltd is same as Chemtec Ltd, Chemtek Ltd, Cemtek ltd, Kemtech Ltd and Kemteck Ltd.
(ii) Bee Kay Ltd is same as BK Ltd, Be Kay Ltd., B Kay Ltd., Bee K Ltd., B.K. Ltd. and Beee Kay Ltd.
4. Change in order of words of name and use of article before proposed name
The application for reservation of name will not be considered if an applicant just changes the order of words or use of article before any name of the existing company for e.g.:
1. Ravi Builders and Contractors Ltd is same as Ravi Contractors and Builders Ltd
2. Congenial Tours Ltd is same as A Congenial Tours Ltd. and The Congenial Tours Ltd.
5. Variation in spelling of two name;
Name including slightly variation in spelling of existing company name would be considered as resembling name and department will reject the application for reserving a name of the company. For example,
Color Technologies Ltd is similar as Colour Technologies Ltd.
6. Addition, deletion or modification of exiting name;
Addition, deletion or modification in any existing name of the company is not allowed and the concerned department will spare no time to reject the proposed name of the company. To instance,
1. Salvage Technologies Ltd is an existing name and it is same as Salvage Technologies Delhi Ltd. and Salvage Delhi Technologies Ltd.
2. Thunder Services Ltd is same as Thunder11 Services Ltd. and One Thunder Services Ltd.
7. Change in meaning either in Hindi or English;
Complete translation or transliteration or nay part of an existing name either in Hindi or English. For Example:
National Electricity Corporation Ltd is same as Rashtriya Vidyut Nigam Ltd.
8. Use of host name such as www or a domain extension such as net, org, dot or com in one or both names
For Example (i) Ultra Solutions Ltd. is same as Ultrasolutions.com Ltd.
(ii) Supreme Ultra Solutions Ltd. is not the same as Ultrasolutions.com Ltd.
9. Word or expression which can be used only after obtaining previous approval of Central Government are given below:
(a) Board;
(b) Commission;
(c) Authority;
(d) Undertaking;
(e) National;
(f) Union;
(g) Central;
(h) Federal;
(i) Republic;
(j) President;
(k) Rashtrapati;
(l) Small Scale Industries;
(m) Khadi and Village Industries Corporation;
(n) Financial Corporation and the like;
(o) Municipal;
(p) Panchayat;
(q) Development Authority;
(r) Prime Minister or Chief Minister;
(s) Minister;
(t) Nation;
(u) Forest corporation;
(v) Development Scheme;
(w) Statute or Statutory;
(x) Court or Judiciary;
(y) Governor;
(z) the use of word Scheme with the name of Government (s), State, India, Bharat or any Government authority or in any manner resembling with the schemes launched by Central, State or local Governments and authorities; and
(za) Bureau
About Author

CA Deepak Gupta
Co Founder
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
3423My Recent Articles
- UltraTech Cement slapped with Rs. 808.78 Cr Income Tax Demand
- GST: High Court upheld constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c), asks government to address ITC issues of genuine purchasers
- Old vs New Tax Regime for Tax Year 2026-27
- High court criticizes Income Tax Department for not releasing ITR Utilities despite 11 years of directions
- Fino Payments Bank CEO Rishi Gupta Gets Bail in GST Case, Bank Clarifies No Direct Link
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.
Recent Posts

All Posts

Tags
No tags yet.









