MCA Clarification on Fixing PAN Validation Error in Form ADT-1 for Sole Proprietor Auditors:

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) announces an important update to resolve the ‘PAN Validation Error’ in Form ADT-1 for Sole Proprietor Auditors.
Select “Individual” in Form ADT-1 to Fix PAN Validation Error, MCA Clarifies

MCA Clarification on Fixing PAN Validation Error in Form ADT-1 for Sole Proprietor Auditors
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) under the Government of India has clarified an important update regarding Form ADT-1. This form is used by companies to inform MCA about any appointment made to the role of auditor.
Sometimes, while filing this form, companies face a ‘PAN Validation Error’. This usually happens when they are appointing an auditor who runs their practice as a Sole Proprietorship firm.
To resolve this problem, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has suggested a simple solution:
At the time of filing Form ADT-1, you should choose the category of “Individual” instead of “Firm” if you as an auditor running a Sole Proprietorship firm. By selecting the “Individual” category, the system will be able to correctly verify the auditor's PAN, and the form will be accepted without any mistakes.
This correction of the mistake will ensure smooth validation and successful submission of Form ADT-1.


About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2702My Recent Articles
- ITAT Condoned Delay After Noting Indeed Technical Glitch on E-filing Portal and Restores Section 12A and 80G ApplicationsPremium
- ITAT Rejects Section 69A Unexplained Money Addition Based on Alleged Over-Invoicing Entry Found in Third-Party SearchPremium
- ITAT Condoned 336-Day Delay in Section 68 Case After Taxpayer Cites Lack Of Online Communication AwarenessPremium
- United Breweries Secures Full Relief from Bombay High Court in Rs 21.92 Crore Service Tax Dispute
- Aries Agro Faces Rs 3.96 Crore GST Demand Over ITC Availment from Retrospectively Cancelled Vendors
Up Next
Loading suggestions…








