Patna High Court annulled the summary order in GST DRC-07 for violating natural justice principles

  • Home
  • Patna High Court annulled the summary order in GST DRC-07 for violating natural justice principles

CA Bimal Jain | Oct 28, 2021 | Views 187858

Patna High Court annulled the summary order in GST DRC-07 for violating natural justice principles

Patna High Court annulled the summary order in GST DRC-07 for violating natural justice principles

In M/s K.R. Steel Traders v. The State of Bihar [Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17795 of 2021 dated October 21, 2021], M/s K.R. Steel Traders (“the Petitioner”) filed petition being aggrieved against Order dated August 16, 2019 passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Taxes, Patna South Circle and Summary Order in Form GST DRC-07 dated August 29, 2019 passed by Deputy Commissioner of State Tax Patna South, Jurisdiction- Patna South, Patna in which the appeal of the Petitioner has been rejected merely on the grounds of being barred by limitation and both the orders were ex parte in nature.

The Hon’ble Patna High Court quashed the orders on the grounds of violation of principles of natural justice i.e. Fair opportunity of hearing was not given and said that no sufficient time was afforded to the Petitioner to represent his case and order passed ex parte in nature does not assign any sufficient reasons even decipherable from the record as to how the officer could determine the amount due and payable by the Petitioner.

The Court further directed de-freezing/de-attaching of the bank accounts of the Petitioner, if attached in reference to the proceedings subject matter of present petition. This shall be done immediately. And the Assessing Authority shall pass a fresh order only after affording adequate opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner.

Further, the Petitioner undertakes to additionally deposit 10% of the amount of the demand raised before the Assessing Officer this shall be done within four weeks. And the Court directed that this deposit shall be without prejudice to the respective rights and contention of the parties and subject to the order passed by the Assessing Officer. However, if it is ultimately found that the Petitioner’s deposit is in excess, the same shall be refunded within two months from the date of passing of the order.

The Petition disposed of by the Court.

(Author can be reached at [email protected])

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

To Read Official Order Download PDF Given Below :

Join Studycafe's What's App Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"




Author Bio

My Recent Articles

HC Raps revenue for failing to act on a transitional-credit claim despite directions Quashed Service tax demand on movie exhibitor under the category of Business Support Service HC: Sets aside clarificatory circular taking away assesse’s substantive right by denying exemption on fish meal Income Tax deduction allowed by Karnataka High Court on loss suffered by assessee on Foreign Rate Fluctuation Initiation of Assessment Proceedings can’t be done if no incriminating material seized at time search View All Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *