Penalty imposed on a private Limited company for not conducting Board Meeting

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs(MCA) has imposed penalty on a private Limited company for not conducting Board Meeting.

Board Meeting

Reetu | Jan 11, 2023 |

Penalty imposed on a private Limited company for not conducting Board Meeting

Penalty imposed on a private Limited company for not conducting Board Meeting

The Ministry of Corporate Affairs(MCA) has imposed penalty on a private Limited company for not conducting Board Meeting.

Company M/s. Hotel Holy Crest Bodhgaya Private Limited, CIN: U74900BR2014PTC022431 (herein after known as Company) is a company incorporated on 18.06.2014 under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956/2013 in the state of Bihar and having its registered office situated at 3, Circular Road Patna ,Bihar-800001, India as per MCA website.

Facts about the Case:

As per Section 92(1)(f) of the Companies Act, 2013: Every company shall prepare a return (hereinafter referred to as the annual return) in the prescribed form containing the particulars as they stood on the close of the financial year regarding – meetings of members or a class thereof, Board and its various committees along with· attendance details meetings of members or a class thereof, Board and its various committees along with attendance details. However, upon examination of the filed E-Forms with this office, it is observed that the Company has not filed annual return since incorporation, therefore no record is available regarding the number of board meetings taken place. Hence, it is implied that the Company has not conducted the board meetings. Therefore, it appears that the provision of section 173(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the company and its directors/ officers in default which inter alia states that: -every company shall hold the first meeting of the Board of Directors within thirty days of the date of its incorporation and thereafter hold a minimum number of four meetings of its Board of Directors every -year in such a manner that not more than one hundred and twenty days shall intervene between two consecutive meetings of the Board.”

Hence, the company and its directors/ officers in default have violated the provisions of section 173(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 w.r.t. non-holding of board meeting since incorporation.

Office has issued show cause notice for default under section 173(1) of the Companies Act 2013 and office has not received any reply from the company and its directors. Hence, the provisions of Section 173(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 has been contravened by the company and its directors/ officers and therefore they are liable for penalty u/s. 450 of the Companies Act, 2013 for the Financial Year 2014-2015 to 2021-2022.

Section 450 states that:- “if a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be liable to a penalty often thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an, officer who is in default or any other person”.

As per clause 85 of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, small company means a company whose paid up capital and turnover shall not exceed rupees four crore and rupees forty crore respectively. As per MCA portal, paid up capital of the company- Hotel Holy Crest Bodhgaya Private Limited is Rs. 100,000 and as regard to turnover, the company has not filed its balance sheet since incorporation, hence turnover could not be ascertained. Therefore, the benefits of small company cannot be extended to this company while adjudicating penalty.

Order:

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and after taking into account the provisions of Rule-11 of Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 (as amended), MCA hereby impose a penalty of Rs.80,000 (Eighty Thousand) each on Company and Directors, viz., Shri Prem Sagar and Smt Prabhawati Devi, for violation of Section 173(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 for the financial years 2014-2015, 2015-2016, 2016-2017, 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022.

The noticee shall pay the amount of penalty individually for the company and its directors (out of own pocket) by way of e-payment (available on Ministry website) under “Pay miscellaneous fees” category in MCA fee and payment Services within 90 (ninety) days of this order. The Challan/SRN generated after payment of penalty through online mode shall be forwarded to this office.

For Official Order Download PDF Given Below:

 

StudyCafe Membership

Join StudyCafe Membership. For More details about Membership Click Join Membership Button
Join Membership

In case of any Doubt regarding Membership you can mail us at [email protected]

Join Studycafe's WhatsApp Group or Telegram Channel for Latest Updates on Government Job, Sarkari Naukri, Private Jobs, Income Tax, GST, Companies Act, Judgements and CA, CS, ICWA, and MUCH MORE!"


Tags: MCA, Penalty


Author Bio
My Recent Articles
NFRA Penalises Partners of Audit Firm M/s Haribhakti and Co. LLP for Audit Lapses NFRA imposes Fine of Rs.2 Crore on Deloitte Haskins for lapses in ZEEL Audit Revamped Income Tax Act expected to take more than a Year to implement Gift Vouchers won’t attract GST; Clarity on GST spurs industry optimism Beedi workers urge a reduction of GST on Beedi to 5% from 28%View All Posts