P&H HC allows filing or revising TRAN-01, not filed/ wrongly filed, manually or electronically by 30th November, 2019

P&H HC allows filing or revising TRAN-01, not filed/ wrongly filed, manually or electronically by 30 th November, 2019 Synopsis: The Hon

P&H HC allows filing or revising TRAN-01, not filed/ wrongly filed, manually or electronically by 30th November, 2019
Synopsis: The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the matter of Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. [CWP No. 30949 of 2018(O&M)] has provided relief to 102 petitioners who have not filed or wrongly filed their TRAN-01 form by directing the revenue to allow such petitioners to file their TRAN-01 forms by November 30th, 2019 holding that accumulated unutilized credits of pre-GST regime are a vested right of the taxpayers.
Facts:
Civil writ petitions in 102 different cases were filed by various taxpayers on account of them not being able to carry forward their unutilized CENVAT credit of duty paid under Central Excise Act, 1944(“CEA, 1944”) and Input Tax Credit of VAT paid under Punjab VAT Act, 2005(“PVAT Act”) or Haryana VAT Act, 2003(“HVAT Act”). The reason for the same being that these taxpayers could not file TRAN-01 (“the form”) and/ or the incorrectly filed the form by the “stipulated last date” i.e. December 27, 2017.
All the petitioners are duly registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act, 2017”) and were also registered under the erstwhile PVAT Act/ HVAT Act and/or CEA, 1944. The petitioners had accrued unutilized credits under the erstwhile laws which were eligible to be carried forward under the new GST regime through filing of form TRAN-01 as per Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017. However, no time limit for the same was prescribed under the relevant section of the said act but Rule 117 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“CGST Rules”) provided for a period of 90 days from the appointed day i.e. July 1st, 2017 which was extended from time to time & the last date was December 27th, 2017.
There were cases where the petitioners didn’t file the form or filed the form wrongly because of varied reasons such as press release showing last date December 31st, 2017, lack of proper knowledge of computer system, complexity in filling different columns of TRAN-I, system glitches, etc.
The petitioners further contended that unutilized credits are a vested right of the taxpayers which cannot be washed away and any contrary interpretation would amount to violation of Article 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India. The Petitioners also contended that no Section or Rule of CGST Act/ CGST Rules provides that unutilized ITC would lapse, if TRAN-I is not filed by due date, thus, refund in cash may be sanctioned in terms of proviso to Section 142(3) of CGST Actif it is held that Petitioners are not entitled to carry forward unutilized ITC because they failed to file TRAN-I by December 27, 2017.
Whereas the Respondents emphasized that the government has permitted all registered persons to file TRAN-I by March 31st, 2019 who furnished evidence of attempt to upload TRAN-I upto last stipulated date. The Petitioners cannot take excuse of technical glitches because they did not attempt to upload TRAN-I. The Respondents further relied on the Hon’ble Gujrat High Court judgment in the case of Willowood Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India; 2018 (10) TMI 261 (“Willowood Chemicals”) which has upheld vires of Rule 117 of CGST Rules, 2017 inferring that the present set of Petitioners are not assailing vires of Rule 117 of CGST Rules, thus they are not entitled to any relief. On the question of incorrect filing of TRAN-I, it was contended that one opportunity was granted to registered persons to revise TRAN-I, however present Petitioners failed to file revise TRAN-I by last date prescribed under Rule 120A of CGST Rules, 2017.
Issues involved:
Whether the accumulated unutilized credits can be allowed to be carry forwarded in cases where TRAN-01 could not be filed or was wrongly filed by December 27, 2017.
Held:
The Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana HC passed a very reasoned ruling in the matter of Civil Writ Petition No. 30949 of 2018 dated November 4th, 2019 observing as under:
- GST is an electronic system based tax regime and most of the people in India are not very conversant with such electronic mechanisms. Therefore, the reasons as provided by the petitioners seem to be justifiable.
- Accrued unutilized credits are a vested right of the petitioners and cannot be taken away as such by the Respondents just on account of procedural or technical grounds.
- The court also relied on the judgements cited by the Petitioners in the case of Siddharth Enterprises Vs the Nodal Officer; 2019 (9) TMI 319 (“Siddharth Enterprises”) as well as Ltd. Vs UOI and others; 2019 (9) TMI 817 (“KrishAuthomotors”)
- Various sections governing the transfer of accumulated unutilized credits from pre-GST regime were summarized from the conjoint reading of those provisions that:
- A registered person to carry forward or avail credit of duty/tax paid on inputs and capital goods under old taxation statutes was required to file TRAN-I;
- Certain restrictions are prescribed in proviso to Section 140(1)but restriction in terms of time frame is prescribed under Rule 117 (1) of the CGST Rules;
- As per Rule 117 (1), TRAN-1 was required to be filed by due date which was declared 27.12.2017. There is no power under Rule 117 (1) to extend last date beyond 27.12.2017, however Rule 117(1A) was inserted w.e.f. 10.9.2018 by which last date was extended upto 31.03.2019.
- The last date i.e. 27.12.2017 prescribed under Rule 117(1) was extended upto 31.03.2019 where TRAN-I could not be filed due to technical glitches. In other words, a registered person who is able to establish that he has failed to file TRAN-I by 27.12.2017 due to technical glitches, was entitled to file TRAN-I upto 31.03.2019.
- There is no provision for filing of TRAN-1 at subsequent stage who failed to furnish evidence of attempt to file by 27.12.2017.
- As per Rule 120A of the CGST Rules, one-time revision/ amendment is permitted within time prescribed under Rule 117, 118, 119 or 120 or within the time period as may be extended by the Commissioner. The Introduction of Rule 117(1A) & Rule 120A and absence of any time period prescribed under Section 140 of the Act indicate that there is no intention of government to deny carry forward of unutilized credit of duty/tax already paid in erstwhile GST regime on the ground of time limit.
- The court fully agrees with findings of the Hon'ble DelhiHC in the case of KrishAuthomotors and the Hon’ble Gujarat HC in the case of Siddharth Enterprises noticed hereinabove and find no reason to take any contrary view.
- The court was not in agreement with the judgment cited by the Revenue i.e. the Hon'ble Gujrat High Court Judgment in the case of Willowood Chemicals as the Gujarat HC in subsequent judgments & Delhi HC in a number of judgments thereafter have permitted petitioners (therein) to file TRAN-I Forms even after the last stipulated date.
- The Court also observed that the Sub Rule (1A) added/inserted to Rule 117 w.e.f. 10.09.2018 has not been noticed by the Hon’ble Gujarat HC in the judgment referred by the Revenue in the case of Willowood Chemicals which goes to the roots of findings recorded by the Hon'ble Gujrat High Court. Thus, all the petitions deserve to succeed.
About Author

A2ZBimal Jain
Chartered Accountant
CA Bimal Jain is a Member of Institute of Chartered Accountants of India since May 1994 and Member of Institute of Company Secretaries of India since December 2006 along with a Bachelors degree in Law. Also, he is a Qualified SAP - FI/CO Consultant and has more than 21 years of experience in Indirect Taxation and specializes in all aspects of Service Tax, Value Added Tax (VAT)/ Central Sales Tax (CST), Central Excise, Customs, Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), Special Economic Zone (SEZ), Export Oriented Unit (EOU), Export-Import Laws and well acquainted with the concept and impact of way forward Goods and Services tax (GST).
A2Z Taxcorp LLP
Delhi, Delhi, India
468My Recent Articles
- Actions taken by the department during enquiry need not necessarily be termed as harassment
- Who are liable to generate e-invoice w.e.f October 1, 2022
- Personal penalty cannot be imposed on the Chairman of the Company for failure in ensuring proper accounting of the goods
- Stayed the order of cancellation of GST Registration of the assessee for continuing the trading activities
- Can CA be arrested- Section 69 vs Section 132 of the CGST Act
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








