Raymond Reality's Subsidiary Receives SCN Alleging Income Escapement:

The department alleges that the company's income worth Rs 1,43,23,625 has escaped the assessment for the financial year 2022-23 under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
TXRL Faces SCN Alleging Income Escapement

Raymond Reality's Subsidiary Receives SCN Alleging Income Escapement
Raymond Realty's subsidiary, Ten X Realty Limited (TXRL), has recently disclosed the receipt of a show cause notice (SCN) from the Mumbai income tax department. The department has claimed that the company's income of Rs 1.43 crore for the financial year 2022-23 has escaped the assessment.
Background of the Case
TXRL has received a show cause notice under Section 148A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated March 11, 2026. The show cause notice relates to a survey action conducted on September 25, 2025, under Section 133A of the Income Tax Act. The department alleges that the company's income worth Rs 1,43,23,625 has escaped the assessment for the financial year 2022-23 under section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
Key Details of Orders
Company's Next Steps
Raymond Realty has said that TXRL is preparing its response to the show-cause notice. The company said it is taking appropriate remedial steps as advised.
Financial Impact
The company also stated that the notice will not have any material impact on the financial, operations or activities of Raymond Realty Limited. However, if any penalty is imposed after the proceedings, it will be payable by Ten X Realty Limited. Ten X Realty Limited's financial statements are already consolidated with the financials of Raymond Realty Limited.
Company's Disclosure Requirement
The company submitted the above information under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.
| Particulars | Details |
| Issuing Authority | The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 8(1), Mumbai |
| Date of Notice | March 11, 2026 |
| Legal Provision | Section 148A(1) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 |
| Amount | Rs 1,43,23,625 |
| Relevant Period | AY 2023-24 |
About Author

Nidhi
Content Writer
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Nidhi is a skilled content writer specializing in personal finance. She creates clear, engaging articles on mutual funds, investments, insurance, and wealth-building strategies. With a passion for simplifying complex financial topics, Nidhi helps readers make informed money decisions with confidence. She can be reached at [email protected]
Studycafe
New Delhi, Delhi, India
1833My Recent Articles
- Karnataka High Court Gives Another Chance in GST Matter Due to Lack of Hearing
- Delay Should Be Condoned if Explanation is Unrefuted: ITAT
- Non-Service of Income Tax Notice, Ill health of taxpayer, ITAT condones Appeal filing delay
- Books of Accounts Cannot be Rejected Without Any Specific Defect: ITAT Kolkata
- Karnataka High Court Sends ITC Matter Back to GST Authorities for Reconsideration
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








