ROC Action on Directors for Failure to Mention DIN in Signed Financials:

ROC Action on Directors for Failure to Mention DIN in Signed Financials

ROC fined company and its defaulting directors for failing to mention DIN in signed financial statements, violating Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013.

ROC Imposes Penalty for DIN Disclosure Failure

authorVanshika vermadateApr 28, 2026
Last update on Apr 28, 2026

Table of Contents

ROC Action on Directors for Failure to Mention DIN in Signed Financials The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Uttar Pradesh, imposed a monetary penalty on a company called Kashi Gramin Vikas Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited and its officers in default for signing the financial statements without mentioning their Director Identification Number (DIN).
ROC Imposes Penalty for Delay in Filing Special Resolution Under Section 117

Background of the Case

The Serious Fraud/Concerned Authority (SCA) of MCA directed an inquiry under the Companies Act. During the inquiry, it was found that in the financial statements filed by the company for FY 2016-17 to 2019-20, the directors did not mention their DIN below their signatures. As per section 158 of the Companies Act 2013, not mentioning DIN is a violation. Therefore, penal action under Section 172 was suggested against the Company and its officers in default.

E-hearing

An e-hearing was scheduled on 25.03.2026. A Show Cause Notice was issued to the company and its officers in default for the violation. During the hearing, Mr. Jai Shankar Agrahari appeared on behalf of the company. He submitted that Mr. Banarasi (DIN 08671111) and Mr. Pavan Kumar Chaubey (DIN 08671116) were appointed as directors only from 28.01.2020, and Mr. Peter Damien (DIN 07467676) was a director from 11.03.2016 to 26.10.2016. Therefore, they were not associated with the company at the time of the non-compliance.
Penalty for Dual DIN: ROC Vijayawada Takes Action under Section 454

Order

It was confirmed that for the fiscal year ending 31.03.2018, the directors who signed the financial statements did not mention their DIN, which is a violation of Section 158. Accordingly, the ROC imposed a Rs 3 lakh penalty on the company and Rs 1 lakh on each officer in default.

About Author

Vanshika verma

Content Writer

Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1539
Up Next

Loading suggestions…