ROC Action on Directors for Failure to Mention DIN in Signed Financials:

ROC fined company and its defaulting directors for failing to mention DIN in signed financial statements, violating Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Imposes Penalty for DIN Disclosure Failure
Table of Contents

ROC Action on Directors for Failure to Mention DIN in Signed Financials
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Uttar Pradesh, imposed a monetary penalty on a company called Kashi Gramin Vikas Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited and its officers in default for signing the financial statements without mentioning their Director Identification Number (DIN).
Background of the Case
The Serious Fraud/Concerned Authority (SCA) of MCA directed an inquiry under the Companies Act. During the inquiry, it was found that in the financial statements filed by the company for FY 2016-17 to 2019-20, the directors did not mention their DIN below their signatures. As per section 158 of the Companies Act 2013, not mentioning DIN is a violation. Therefore, penal action under Section 172 was suggested against the Company and its officers in default.E-hearing
An e-hearing was scheduled on 25.03.2026. A Show Cause Notice was issued to the company and its officers in default for the violation. During the hearing, Mr. Jai Shankar Agrahari appeared on behalf of the company. He submitted that Mr. Banarasi (DIN 08671111) and Mr. Pavan Kumar Chaubey (DIN 08671116) were appointed as directors only from 28.01.2020, and Mr. Peter Damien (DIN 07467676) was a director from 11.03.2016 to 26.10.2016. Therefore, they were not associated with the company at the time of the non-compliance.Order
It was confirmed that for the fiscal year ending 31.03.2018, the directors who signed the financial statements did not mention their DIN, which is a violation of Section 158. Accordingly, the ROC imposed a Rs 3 lakh penalty on the company and Rs 1 lakh on each officer in default.About Author
Vanshika verma
Content Writer
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Vanshika Verma is a Content Writer with 1+ year of experience at Studycafe.in. A B.Com graduate from Delhi University, She writes articles on Finance, Tax, ICAI, GST, and the latest financial news, with a focus on making complex topics easy for readers and professionals.
Studycafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
1642My Recent Articles
- ITAT Deletes Rs 1.24 Crore Additions Over Form 26A and Cash PaymentsPremium
- ITAT Pune Sends Tax Dispute Back to CIT(A) Over Rule 46A ViolationPremium
- ITAT Sets Aside Ex Parte Rejection of Section 12A and 80G Applications, Orders Fresh HearingPremium
- ITAT Cancels Rs 9.27 Lakh Penalty, Directs Tax Department to Grant Immunity to AssesseePremium
- ITAT Sends Cooperative Society’s Section 80P Interest Claim Back to AO for Fresh ExaminationPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








