Company and Directors Fined for Non-Disclosure of Registered Office Change: ROC:

ROC Bangalore penalises the company and its directors with Rs 2.14 lakh for non-compliance with registered office address requirements under the Companies Act, 2013.
Company Penalised for Rs 2.14 lakh for Section 12(3)(c) Violation

Company and Directors Fined for Non-Disclosure of Registered Office Change: ROC
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), Bangalore, has imposed a 2.14 lakh penalty on the company, Minance Investment Advisors Private Limited, and its two directors for committing non-compliance under Section 12(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.
A company under the provisions of Section 12(3)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, is obligated to mention the address of its registered office and the CIN number on its official documents, like Business letters, billboards, and letterhead. However, letters sent to the company at its registered address, i.e., No. 35/37 (Old No. 598), 11th Main Road, Jayanagar, 5th Block, Bangalore - 560041, were returned undelivered with the remark that no such person or firm exists at the mentioned address.
It was, furthermore, noted that the company had not furnished Form INC-22, informing about the revision in the registered office address. Moreover, physical verification at the registered office of the disputed company was conducted on February 26, 2024, where it was discovered that the company had already vacated the premises on May 08, 2019, after its lease expired. The proprietor had given a copy of the officially registered document showing that the lease was surrendered on May 08, 2019. Meaning the disputed company had not been operating at its registered office since May 8, 2019; however, it still did not inform the Registrar of Companies (ROC) about the same within the legally allowed time limit of 30 days.
Consequently, the company and its directors were liable for penal action for committing a violation under Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013. Considering the same, the concerned authorities imposed a penalty of Rs 1 lakh on the company, Minance Investment Advisors Private Limited and Rs 1.14 lakh on its two directors, Anurag Bhatia and Sarbashish Basu.
They have been instructed to pay the imposed penalty amount and rectify the default within 90 days of receiving the order.
About Author

Saloni Kumari
Content Writer
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
Saloni is a Content Writer with 2+ years of experience at studycafe.in. She writes legal, taxation, and finance related content including GST, Income Tax etc. Skilled in translating complex judicial pronouncements and regulatory developments into clear, and reader-friendly articles. Experienced in covering judgements of ITAT, High Court, GSTAT, and news related to Income Tax, GST, and corporate law. She can be reached at [email protected].
StudyCafe
Delhi, Delhi, India
2484My Recent Articles
- ITAT Says Identity and Creditworthiness Irrelevant Where Loan Was Directly Paid to Haryana Mining DepartmentPremium
- Earlier Rejection Cannot Be Sole Ground to Reject Fresh Section 12AB and 80G Registration Applications, Says ITATPremium
- Cash Deposited During Demonetisation Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A if Linked to Business, Holds ITAT Premium
- ITAT Condones 1,731-Day Delay, Remands Cancer Trust's Section 12A Registration Application for Fresh ConsiderationPremium
- ITAT Lowers Estimated Profit Rate from 8% to 4% After Considering State Shutdown and Medicine Trade MarginsPremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








