ROC Company and Directors Penalised for 245-Day Delay in Filing Annual Returns:

Registrar Penalizes Company and Directors for Failure to File Annual Returns Under Section 92
ROC Penalises Company and Directors for Delay in Filing Annual Return

ROC: Company and Directors Penalised for 245-Day Delay in Filing Annual Returns
The Registrar of Companies (ROC), acting as the Adjudicating Officer, initiated proceedings against Sri Narayani Benefit Fund Nidhi Limited and its officers in default. The company was found to violates Section 92(4) of the Companies Act, 2013, which mandates the filing of annual returns within sixty days from the date on which the Annual General Meeting (AGM) is held.
The company failed to file its annual return for the financial year ending March 31, 2021. Despite an adjudication notice and the opportunity for a physical hearing, the company failed to rectify the non-compliance or give a satisfactory justification for the delay.
Main Issue: Whether the company and its directors are liable for penalties under Section 92(5) of the Companies Act, 2013, for the continuous failure to file the mandatory Annual Return (Form MGT-7) for the Financial Year 2020-21.
ROC Decided: The Adjudicating Officer imposed a total penalty of Rs. 1,41,800 on the company and its three directors. Under Section 92(5), the penalty is calculated at ten thousand rupees plus one hundred rupees for each day during which the failure continues, subject to a maximum cap. For the 318 days of delay, the Company was fined Rs. 41,800, while the three directors were each fined Rs. 33,333, which is the maximum limit for officers in default.
The ROC directed that the directors must pay the penalty from their personal sources and warned of further penal consequences under Section 454(8) if the amount is not deposited within the stipulated timeframe.
To Read Full Judgment, Download PDF Given Below
About Author

Meetu Kumari
Content Manager
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Meetu Kumari is an Experienced Advocate and Content Writer with 4+ years of demonstrated history of working in the law practice industry. Skilled in Developing Content, Researching, and Drafting. Strong professional with a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) focused on Law from Gujarat National Law University.
Studycafe
Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
2255My Recent Articles
- ITAT Allows Section 80-IE Deduction on Enhanced Business Income After Assessment AdditionPremium
- India Notifies India-Sri Lanka DTAA Protocol Introducing Principal Purpose Test
- ITAT: Entire Gross Receipts of Trust Cannot Be Taxed Despite Section 11 DenialPremium
- ITAT Quashes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty After Original Assessment Was Set AsidePremium
- ITAT Remands Rs 36.60 Crore TP Adjustment in Veolia Intra-Group Services CasePremium
Up Next
Loading suggestions…
Recent Posts

All Posts

Recent Posts

All Posts








